» Articles » PMID: 26482733

Fusion of Clinical and Stochastic Finite Element Data for Hip Fracture Risk Prediction

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2015 Oct 21
PMID 26482733
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hip fracture affects more than 250,000 people in the US and 1.6 million worldwide per year. With an aging population, the development of reliable fracture risk models is therefore of prime importance. Due to the complexity of the hip fracture phenomenon, the use of clinical data only, as it is done traditionally, might not be sufficient to ensure an accurate and robust hip fracture prediction model. In order to increase the predictive ability of the risk model, the authors propose to supplement the clinical data with computational data from finite element models. The fusion of the two types of data is performed using deterministic and stochastic computational data. In the latter case, uncertainties in loading and material properties of the femur are accounted for and propagated through the finite element model. The predictive capability of a support vector machine (SVM) risk model constructed by combining clinical and finite element data was assessed using a Women׳s Health Initiative (WHI) dataset. The dataset includes common factors such as age and BMD as well as geometric factors obtained from DXA imaging. The fusion of computational and clinical data systematically leads to an increase in predictive ability of the SVM risk model as measured by the AUC metric. It is concluded that the largest gains in AUC are obtained by the stochastic approach. This gain decreases as the dimensionality of the problem increases: a 5.3% AUC improvement was achieved for a 9 dimensional problem involving geometric factors and weight while a 1.3% increase was obtained for a 20 dimensional case including geometric and conventional factors.

Citing Articles

Effect of Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning on Prediction of Hip Fracture Risk: Systematic Review.

Cha Y, Kim J, Kim J, Seo S, Lee S, Yoo J J Bone Metab. 2023; 30(3):245-252.

PMID: 37718902 PMC: 10509025. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2023.30.3.245.


Numerical Modeling of Shockwave Treatment of Knee Joint.

Eremina G, Smolin A Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(24).

PMID: 34947273 PMC: 8707368. DOI: 10.3390/ma14247678.


Risk Assessment of Hip Fracture Based on Machine Learning.

Galassi A, Martin-Guerrero J, Villamor E, Monserrat C, Ruperez M Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021; 2020:8880786.

PMID: 33425008 PMC: 7772022. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8880786.


A multiscale model to predict current absolute risk of femoral fracture in a postmenopausal population.

Bhattacharya P, Altai Z, Qasim M, Viceconti M Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018; 18(2):301-318.

PMID: 30276488 PMC: 6418062. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-018-1081-0.

References
1.
Reilly D, Burstein A, Frankel V . The elastic modulus for bone. J Biomech. 1974; 7(3):271-5. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(74)90018-9. View

2.
Soong T, Wrzeszczynski K, Rost B . Physical protein-protein interactions predicted from microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(22):2608-14. PMC: 2579715. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn498. View

3.
Jackson R, LaCroix A, Cauley J, McGowan J . The Women's Health Initiative calcium-vitamin D trial: overview and baseline characteristics of participants. Ann Epidemiol. 2003; 13(9 Suppl):S98-106. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00046-2. View

4.
Langer R, White E, Lewis C, Kotchen J, Hendrix S, Trevisan M . The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol. 2003; 13(9 Suppl):S107-21. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00047-4. View

5.
Schileo E, Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M . Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. J Biomech. 2007; 41(2):356-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.009. View