» Articles » PMID: 26478909

Organization of the Mammalian Locomotor CPG: Review of Computational Model and Circuit Architectures Based on Genetically Identified Spinal Interneurons(1,2,3)

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Oct 20
PMID 26478909
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The organization of neural circuits that form the locomotor central pattern generator (CPG) and provide flexor-extensor and left-right coordination of neuronal activity remains largely unknown. However, significant progress has been made in the molecular/genetic identification of several types of spinal interneurons, including V0 (V0D and V0V subtypes), V1, V2a, V2b, V3, and Shox2, among others. The possible functional roles of these interneurons can be suggested from changes in the locomotor pattern generated in mutant mice lacking particular neuron types. Computational modeling of spinal circuits may complement these studies by bringing together data from different experimental studies and proposing the possible connectivity of these interneurons that may define rhythm generation, flexor-extensor interactions on each side of the cord, and commissural interactions between left and right circuits. This review focuses on the analysis of potential architectures of spinal circuits that can reproduce recent results and suggest common explanations for a series of experimental data on genetically identified spinal interneurons, including the consequences of their genetic ablation, and provides important insights into the organization of the spinal CPG and neural control of locomotion.

Citing Articles

Episodic rhythmicity is generated by a distributed neural network in the developing mammalian spinal cord.

Milla-Cruz J, Lognon A, Tran M, Di Vito S, Loer C, Shonak A iScience. 2025; 28(3):111971.

PMID: 40060907 PMC: 11889695. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111971.


Operation of spinal sensorimotor circuits controlling phase durations during tied-belt and split-belt locomotion after a lateral thoracic hemisection.

Rybak I, Shevtsova N, Audet J, Yassine S, Markin S, Prilutsky B Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39868989 PMC: 11771960. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.103504.


Balancing central control and sensory feedback produces adaptable and robust locomotor patterns in a spiking, neuromechanical model of the salamander spinal cord.

Pazzaglia A, Bicanski A, Ferrario A, Arreguit J, Ryczko D, Ijspeert A PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(1):e1012101.

PMID: 39836708 PMC: 11771899. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012101.


Operation regimes of spinal circuits controlling locomotion and the role of supraspinal drives and sensory feedback.

Rybak I, Shevtsova N, Markin S, Prilutsky B, Frigon A Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39401073 PMC: 11473106. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98841.


Operation of spinal sensorimotor circuits controlling phase durations during tied-belt and split-belt locomotion after a lateral thoracic hemisection.

Rybak I, Shevtsova N, Audet J, Yassine S, Markin S, Prilutsky B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39314446 PMC: 11419089. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.10.612376.


References
1.
Grillner S . Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion. Neuron. 2006; 52(5):751-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.008. View

2.
Gosgnach S . The role of genetically-defined interneurons in generating the mammalian locomotor rhythm. Integr Comp Biol. 2011; 51(6):903-12. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icr022. View

3.
Grillner S, El Manira A . The intrinsic operation of the networks that make us locomote. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015; 31:244-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.003. View

4.
Stuart D, Hultborn H . Thomas Graham Brown (1882--1965), Anders Lundberg (1920-), and the neural control of stepping. Brain Res Rev. 2008; 59(1):74-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.06.001. View

5.
Bannatyne B, Edgley S, Hammar I, Jankowska E, Maxwell D . Networks of inhibitory and excitatory commissural interneurons mediating crossed reticulospinal actions. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 18(8):2273-84. PMC: 1971243. View