» Articles » PMID: 26474333

Effect of Environment and Sugar Beet Genotype on Root Rot Development and Pathogen Profile During Storage

Overview
Journal Phytopathology
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Oct 17
PMID 26474333
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Storage rots represent an economically important factor impairing the storability of sugar beet by increasing sucrose losses and invert sugar content. Understanding the development of disease management strategies, knowledge about major storage pathogens, and factors influencing their occurrence is crucial. In comprehensive storage trials conducted under controlled conditions, the effects of environment and genotype on rot development and associated quality changes were investigated. Prevalent species involved in rot development were identified by a newly developed microarray. The strongest effect on rot development was assigned to environment factors followed by genotypic effects. Despite large variation in rot severity (sample range 0 to 84%), the spectrum of microorganisms colonizing sugar beet remained fairly constant across all treatments with dominant species belonging to the fungal genera Botrytis, Fusarium, and Penicillium. The intensity of microbial tissue necrotization was strongly correlated with sucrose losses (R² = 0.79 to 0.91) and invert sugar accumulation (R² = 0.91 to 0.95). A storage rot resistance bioassay was developed that could successfully reproduce the genotype ranking observed in storage trials. Quantification of fungal biomass indicates that genetic resistance is based on a quantitative mechanism. Further work is required to understand the large environmental influence on rot development in sugar beet.

Citing Articles

Sugar beet root susceptibility to storage rots and downregulation of plant defense genes increases with time in storage.

Kandel S, Eide J, Firrincieli A, Finger F, Lafta A, Fugate K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27235.

PMID: 39516509 PMC: 11549380. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78323-4.


Whole genome sequencing of and isolates extracted from sugar beet roots.

Kandel S, Strausbaugh C, Bill M, Adhikari B, Hu X Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024; 13(10):e0072724.

PMID: 39258906 PMC: 11465820. DOI: 10.1128/mra.00727-24.


A biotroph sets the stage for a necrotroph to play: ' Phytoplasma solani' infection of sugar beet facilitated root rot.

Duduk N, Vico I, Kosovac A, Stepanovic J, Curcic Z, Vuckovic N Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1164035.

PMID: 37152751 PMC: 10158981. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1164035.


Understanding the sugar beet holobiont for sustainable agriculture.

Wolfgang A, Temme N, Tilcher R, Berg G Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1151052.

PMID: 37138624 PMC: 10149816. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1151052.


Wounding rapidly alters transcription factor expression, hormonal signaling, and phenolic compound metabolism in harvested sugarbeet roots.

Fugate K, Finger F, Lafta A, Dogramaci M, Khan M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1070247.

PMID: 36684748 PMC: 9853395. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1070247.