Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is designed to achieve results comparable to metallic drug-eluting stents at 1 year, with improved long-term outcomes. Whether the 1-year clinical and angiographic results of BVS are noninferior to current-generation drug-eluting stents has not been established.
Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the angiographic efficacy and clinical safety and effectiveness of BVS in a randomized trial designed to enable approval of the BVS in China.
Methods: Eligible patients with 1 or 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to BVS or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by diabetes and the number of lesions treated. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were planned at 1 year in all patients. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-segment late loss (LL), powered for noninferiority with a margin of 0.15 mm.
Results: A total of 480 patients were randomized (241 BVS vs. 239 CoCr-EES) at 24 sites. Acute clinical device success (98.0% vs. 99.6%; p = 0.22) and procedural success (97.0% and 98.3%; p = 0.37) were comparable in BVS- and CoCr-EES-treated patients, respectively. The primary endpoint of in-segment LL at 1 year was 0.19 ± 0.38 mm for BVS versus 0.13 ± 0.38 mm for CoCr-EES; the 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.14 mm, achieving noninferiority of BVS compared with CoCr-EES (pnoninferiority = 0.01). BVS and CoCr-EES also had similar 1-year rates of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization; 3.4% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.62) and definite/probable scaffold/stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 1.00).
Conclusions: In the present multicenter randomized trial, BVS was noninferior to CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of in-segment LL at 1 year. (A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold [Absorb BVS] System in Chinese Population-ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT]; NCT01923740).
Neoatherosclerosis: A Distinctive Pathological Mechanism of Stent Failure.
Jiang M, Zhang Y, Han Y, Yuan X, Gao L Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(3):95.
PMID: 39076931 PMC: 11263888. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2503095.
Gao Y, Yang H, Qiu Z, Qi F, Lu Q, Zheng J Bioact Mater. 2024; 39:135-146.
PMID: 38783928 PMC: 11112549. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.05.027.
Variability in research culture across busy catheterisation labs in the Asia-Pacific region.
Narang M, Saxena A, Kaur R, Gopa H, West N AsiaIntervention. 2024; 10(1):26-33.
PMID: 38425813 PMC: 10900241. DOI: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00005.
Development and Future Trends of Protective Strategies for Magnesium Alloy Vascular Stents.
Liu D, Yang K, Chen S Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(1).
PMID: 38203922 PMC: 10779993. DOI: 10.3390/ma17010068.
Thrombosis and myocardial infarction: the role of bioresorbable scaffolds.
Leesar M, Feldman M J Cardiovasc Aging. 2023; 3(1).
PMID: 37362388 PMC: 10288217. DOI: 10.20517/jca.2022.41.