Genetic Contributions to Attentional Response Time Slopes Across Repeated Trials

Overview

Journal BMC Neurosci

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 Oct 17

PMID 26471374

Citations 1

Authors

Rebecca A Lundwall

James L Dannemiller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Attention provides vital contribution to everyday functioning, and deficits in attention feature in many psychological disorders. Improved understanding of attention may eventually be critical to early identification and treatment of attentional deficits. One step in that direction is to acquire a better understanding of genetic associations with performance on a task measuring reflexive (exogenous) visual attention. Reflexive attention is an important component of overall attention because (along with voluntary selective attention) it participates in determining where attention is allocated and how susceptible to distractors the subject might be. The task that we used involves the presentation of a target that is preceded by one of several different types of cues (none, double, or single, either ipsilateral or contralateral to where the target subsequently appears). We used several different outcome measures depending on the cue presented. We have previously studied the relationship between selected genes and mean response time (RT). Here we report on the contributions of genetic markers to RT increases or decreases over the course of the task (linear trend in RT slope).

Results: Specifically, we find that RT slope for a variety of reflexive attention outcome measures is dependent on DAT1 genotype. DRD4 was near significant for one outcome measure in the final (best) model. APOE, COMT, and DBH were not significant in any models.

Conclusions: It is especially interesting that genotype predicts linear changes in RT across trials (and not just mean differences or moment-to-moment variability). DAT1 is a gene that produces a protein involved in the transport of dopamine from the synapse. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has associated neurotransmitter genotypes with RT slope on a reflexive attention experiment. The direction of these effects is consistent with genetic risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). That is, those with two risk alleles for ADHD (6R/6R on the DAT1 intron 8 VNTR) either got slower as the task progressed or had the least improvement. Those with no risk alleles (5R/5R) had the most improvement in RT as the task progressed.

Citing Articles

Prenatal Tobacco Exposure Modulated the Association of Genetic variants with Diagnosed ADHD and its symptom domain in children: A Community Based Case-Control Study.

Wang Y, Hu D, Chen W, Xue H, Du Y Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):4274.

PMID: 30862909 PMC: 6414688. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40850-w.

References

BEANE M, Marrocco R . Norepinephrine and acetylcholine mediation of the components of reflexive attention: implications for attention deficit disorders. Prog Neurobiol. 2004; 74(3):167-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.09.001. View

Johnson K, Barry E, Bellgrove M, Cox M, Kelly S, Daibhis A . Dissociation in response to methylphenidate on response variability in a group of medication naïve children with ADHD. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 46(5):1532-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.002. View

Huang-Pollock C, Karalunas S, Tam H, Moore A . Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: a meta-analysis of CPT performance. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012; 121(2):360-71. PMC: 3664643. DOI: 10.1037/a0027205. View

Greenwood P, Sunderland T, Friz J, Parasuraman R . Genetics and visual attention: selective deficits in healthy adult carriers of the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(21):11661-6. PMC: 17257. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.21.11661. View

Brookes K, Neale B, Sugden K, Khan N, Asherson P, DSouza U . Relationship between VNTR polymorphisms of the human dopamine transporter gene and expression in post-mortem midbrain tissue. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2007; 144B(8):1070-8. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30572. View

Bellgrove M, Hawi Z, Gill M, Robertson I . The cognitive genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): sustained attention as a candidate phenotype. Cortex. 2006; 42(6):838-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70426-x. View

Rommelse N, Altink M, Arias-Vasquez A, Buschgens C, Fliers E, Faraone S . A review and analysis of the relationship between neuropsychological measures and DAT1 in ADHD. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008; 147B(8):1536-46. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30848. View

Chen W, Zhou K, Sham P, Franke B, Kuntsi J, Campbell D . DSM-IV combined type ADHD shows familial association with sibling trait scores: a sampling strategy for QTL linkage. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008; 147B(8):1450-60. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30672. View

Johnson K, Kelly S, Bellgrove M, Barry E, Cox M, Gill M . Response variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: evidence for neuropsychological heterogeneity. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 45(4):630-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.034. View

10.

Chica A, Bartolomeo P, Lupianez J . Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behav Brain Res. 2012; 237:107-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.027. View

11.

Lee T, Yu Y, Hong C, Tsai S, Wu H, Chen T . The influence of apolipoprotein E Epsilon4 polymorphism on qEEG profiles in healthy young females: a resting EEG study. Brain Topogr. 2012; 25(4):431-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-012-0229-y. View

12.

Kebir O, Tabbane K, Sengupta S, Joober R . Candidate genes and neuropsychological phenotypes in children with ADHD: review of association studies. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009; 34(2):88-101. PMC: 2647566. View

13.

Johns M . A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991; 14(6):540-5. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540. View

14.

Ainge J, Jenkins T, Winn P . Induction of c-fos in specific thalamic nuclei following stimulation of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 20(7):1827-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03647.x. View

15.

Greenwood P, Lambert C, Sunderland T, Parasuraman R . Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on spatial attention, working memory, and their interaction in healthy, middle-aged adults: results From the National Institute of Mental Health's BIOCARD study. Neuropsychology. 2005; 19(2):199-211. PMC: 1350931. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.2.199. View

16.

Barnes K, Howard Jr J, Howard D, Kenealy L, Vaidya C . Two forms of implicit learning in childhood ADHD. Dev Neuropsychol. 2010; 35(5):494-505. PMC: 2925298. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2010.494750. View

17.

Rusted J, Evans S, King S, Dowell N, Tabet N, Tofts P . APOE e4 polymorphism in young adults is associated with improved attention and indexed by distinct neural signatures. Neuroimage. 2012; 65:364-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.010. View

18.

Jones S, Butler B, Kintzel F, Salmon J, Klein R, Eskes G . Measuring the components of attention using the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB). Psychol Assess. 2015; 27(4):1286-300. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000148. View

19.

Hutchison K, Stallings M, McGeary J, Bryan A . Population stratification in the candidate gene study: fatal threat or red herring?. Psychol Bull. 2004; 130(1):66-79. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.66. View

20.

Bioulac S, Lallemand S, Rizzo A, Philip P, Fabrigoule C, Bouvard M . Impact of time on task on ADHD patient's performances in a virtual classroom. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012; 16(5):514-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.01.006. View