» Articles » PMID: 26471350

Development and External Validation of a Prostate Health Index-based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Oct 17
PMID 26471350
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To develop and externally validate a prostate health index (PHI)-based nomogram for predicting the presence of prostate cancer (PCa) at biopsy in Chinese men with prostate-specific antigen 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination (DRE). 347 men were recruited from two hospitals between 2012 and 2014 to develop a PHI-based nomogram to predict PCa. To validate these results, we used a separate cohort of 230 men recruited at another center between 2008 and 2013. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to assess the ability to predict PCa. A nomogram was derived from the multivariable logistic regression model and its accuracy was assessed by the area under the ROC (AUC). PHI achieved the highest AUC of 0.839 in the development cohort compared to the other predictors (p < 0.001). Including age and prostate volume, a PHI-based nomogram was constructed and rendered an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.813-0.938). The AUC of the nomogram in the validation cohort was 0.786 (95% CI 0.678-0.894). In clinical effectiveness analyses, the PHI-based nomogram reduced unnecessary biopsies from 42.6% to 27% using a 5% threshold risk of PCa to avoid biopsy with no increase in the number of missed cases relative to conventional biopsy decision.

Citing Articles

Nomogram Using Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer in the Gray Zone: Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Chung J, Kim J, Lee S, Park H, Song G, Song W World J Mens Health. 2023; 42(1):168-177.

PMID: 37118959 PMC: 10782127. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.220223.


Development and validation of a multi-parameter nomogram for predicting prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis from Handan Central Hospital in China.

Nan L, Guo K, Li M, Wu Q, Huo S PeerJ. 2022; 10:e12912.

PMID: 35256916 PMC: 8898009. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12912.


Prostate health index is useful for prostate cancer detecting in Chinese people.

Huang Y, Gu X, Wang Y, Hou J, Qi X Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 8(3):836-839.

PMID: 35116822 PMC: 8798185. DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.05.08.


The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index.

Shan J, Liu Z, Geng X, Feng Y, Yang X, Xu H J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; 36(1):e24098.

PMID: 34816496 PMC: 8761435. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24098.


Correlation between Gleason score distribution and Prostate Health Index in patients with prostate-specific antigen values of 2.5-10 ng/mL.

Choi J, Kang M, Sung H, Jeon H, Jeong B, Seo S Investig Clin Urol. 2020; 61(6):582-587.

PMID: 33135403 PMC: 7606122. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200084.


References
1.
Peyromaure M, Debre B, Mao K, Zhang G, Wang Y, Sun Z . Management of prostate cancer in China: a multicenter report of 6 institutions. J Urol. 2005; 174(5):1794-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176817.46279.93. View

2.
Zhu Y, Yang X, Han C, Dai B, Zhang H, Shi G . Pathological features of localized prostate cancer in China: a contemporary analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0121076. PMC: 4370496. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121076. View

3.
Steyerberg E, Vickers A, Cook N, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N . Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2009; 21(1):128-38. PMC: 3575184. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2. View

4.
Bruzzese D, Mazzarella C, Ferro M, Perdona S, Chiodini P, Perruolo G . Prostate health index vs percent free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in men with "gray" prostate-specific antigen levels at first biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Res. 2014; 164(6):444-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.06.006. View

5.
Louie K, Seigneurin A, Cathcart P, Sasieni P . Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of PSA screening? A meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014; 26(5):848-864. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu525. View