» Articles » PMID: 26469918

Application of Additional Medial Plate in Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures With Unstable Medial Column: A Finite Element Study and Clinical Practice

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Oct 16
PMID 26469918
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use finite element analysis to compare the biomechanical characteristics after lateral locking plate (LLP) or LLP with a medial anatomical locking plate (LLP-MLP) fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an unstable medial column.First, a 3-dimensional, finite element analysis model was developed. Next, LLP and LLP-MLP implants were instrumented into the proximal humeral fracture models. Compressive and rotational loads were then applied to the humerus model to determine the biomechanical characteristics. Both normal and osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures were simulated using 2 internal fixation methods each under 7 loading conditions. To assess the biomechanical characteristics, the construct stiffness, fracture micromotion, and stress distribution on the implants were recorded and compared.The LLP-MLP method provided both lateral and medial support that reduced the stress on the LLP and the amount of displacement in the fracture region. In contrast, the LLP method resulted in more instability in the medial column and larger magnitudes of stress. In osteoporotic bone, the LLP was more inclined to fail than LLP-MLP.The LLP-MLP method provides a strong support for the medial column and increases the stability of the region surrounding the fracture.

Citing Articles

Enhanced Biomechanical Stability in Proximal Humeral Fractures: Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Endosteal Anatomical Support Nail for Improved Fixation in Elderly Patients.

Chen J, Wang Z, Li C, He P, Chen Z, Sun L Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(2):551-562.

PMID: 39601199 PMC: 11787969. DOI: 10.1111/os.14297.


Finite element analysis and biomechanical study of "sandwich" fixation in the treatment of elderly proximal humerus fractures.

Lv Y, Zhang Z, Qv J, Sheng Q, Zhang J, Piao C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1425643.

PMID: 39040497 PMC: 11260706. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1425643.


Biomechanical Design Optimization of Distal Humerus Fracture Plates: A Review.

Zdero R, Brzozowski P, Schemitsch E Biomed Res Int. 2024; 2024:6015794.

PMID: 38966093 PMC: 11223906. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6015794.


The addition of cerclage wiring does not improve proximal bicortical fixation of locking plates for Type C periprosthetic fractures in synthetic humeri.

Gupta R, Schmidt E, Namdari S, Stone M, Hast M Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022; 97:105709.

PMID: 35780699 PMC: 10096358. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105709.


Comparative FE biomechanical and microbial adhesion analyses on an implanted humerus.

Tropea A, Tisano A, Bruschetta A, Borzelli D, Migliorato A, Nirta G J Orthop. 2022; 32:78-84.

PMID: 35619601 PMC: 9127272. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.05.011.


References
1.
Turner A, Gillies R, Sekel R, Morris P, Bruce W, Walsh W . Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(4):705-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.02.002. View

2.
Osterhoff G, Ossendorf C, Wanner G, Simmen H, Werner C . The calcar screw in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures--a case study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011; 6:50. PMC: 3189144. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-50. View

3.
Liang D, Ye L, Jiang X, Yang P, Zhou G, Yao Z . Biomechanical effects of cement distribution in the fractured area on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Surg Res. 2015; 195(1):246-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.053. View

4.
Gardner M, Weil Y, Barker J, Kelly B, Helfet D, Lorich D . The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(3):185-91. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180333094. View

5.
Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, Grum B, Horsnaes M, Aalberg J . Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987; 58(1):75-7. DOI: 10.3109/17453678709146347. View