» Articles » PMID: 26465001

No Effect of 2 MA Anodal TDCS Over the M1 on Performance and Practice Effect on Grooved Pegboard Test and Trail Making Test B

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Oct 15
PMID 26465001
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can facilitate motor performance and learning. In this double-blind experiment, 60 healthy human subjects (29 females) were randomized into three groups (active tDCS, sham tDCS, and no-treatment control group) in order to investigate the effect of a 20 min session of 2 mA tDCS over the motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand on practice effect and performance on the Grooved Pegboard Test (GPT) and Trail Making Test (TMT). Performance was operationalized as the time to complete the tests before, during, and after stimulation. The practice effect was termed as the difference in time to complete the tests from pretest to post-test. Data on body mass index (BMI), head circumference, sleep status, interelectrode impedance, and caffeine and nicotine use were sampled to control for the influence of individual differences on the effect of tDCS. Adverse effects were registered using a standardized form. The results indicated no effect of tDCS on performance and practice effects on the GPT and TMT. For all groups, BMI was a predictor for a practice effect on the TMT. In the active tDCS group, high caffeine intake and low impedance predicted a practice effect on the GPT for the dominant hand. The present results suggest that impedance levels in tDCS studies should be routinely reported in future studies, as it might not only provide valuable information on the efficacy of the blinding conditions and participant discomfort, but also correlate with individual differences that are relevant to the outcome of the stimulation.

Citing Articles

Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance.

Rybina E, Colosio M, Shestakova A, Klucharev V Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1104410.

PMID: 38170108 PMC: 10760977. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410.


Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Antal A, Luber B, Brem A, Bikson M, Brunoni A, Cohen Kadosh R Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2022; 7:146-165.

PMID: 35734582 PMC: 9207555. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.05.002.


Online polarity-dependent effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor speed and fine manual dexterity. A randomized controlled trial.

Kinakool A, Abualait T Saudi Med J. 2020; 41(1):18-24.

PMID: 31915790 PMC: 7001060. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2020.1.24813.


Effects of tDCS of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Dual-Task Performance Involving Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Task in Healthy Older Adults.

Ljubisavljevic M, Oommen J, Filipovic S, Bjekic J, Szolics M, Nagelkerke N Front Aging Neurosci. 2019; 11:144.

PMID: 31275139 PMC: 6592113. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00144.


Examining the Interactions Between Expectations and tDCS Effects on Motor and Cognitive Performance.

Rabipour S, Vidjen P, Remaud A, Davidson P, Tremblay F Front Neurosci. 2019; 12:999.

PMID: 30666182 PMC: 6330301. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00999.


References
1.
Nitsche M, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W . Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003; 15(4):619-26. DOI: 10.1162/089892903321662994. View

2.
Vines B, Nair D, Schlaug G . Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006; 17(6):671-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200604240-00023. View

3.
Stagg C, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses Z, Matthews P, Johansen-Berg H . Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(5):800-804. PMC: 3083512. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.009. View

4.
Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M . tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 216(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9. View

5.
Mendonca M, Santana M, Baptista A, Datta A, Bikson M, Fregni F . Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models. J Pain. 2011; 12(5):610-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.015. View