» Articles » PMID: 26464594

Evaluation of the Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Permanent Molars and the Incidence of the Second Mesiobuccal Root Canal in Greek Population Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal Open Dent J
Publisher Bentham Open
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Oct 15
PMID 26464594
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography is an alternative imaging technique which has been recently introduced in the field of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology. It has rapidly gained great popularity among clinicians due to its ability to detect lesions and defects of the orofacial region and provide three-dimensional information about them. In the field of Endodontics, CBCT can be a useful tool to reveal tooth morphology irregularities, additional root canals and vertical root fractures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the root and root canal morphology of the maxillary permanent molars in Greek population using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Materials And Methods: 273 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were examined. The number of roots and root canals of the first and second maxillary molars were evaluated. Root canal configuration was classified according to Weine's classification by two independent examiners and statistical analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 812 molars (410 first and 402 second ones) were evaluated. The vast majority of both first and second molars had three roots (89.26% and 85.07%, respectively). Most first molars had four canals, while most second molars had three. In the mesiobuccal roots, one foramen was recorded in 80.91% of all teeth. Other rare morphologic variations were also found, such as fusion of a maxillary second molar with a supernumerary tooth.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that more attention should be given to the detection of additional canals during root canal treatment in maxillary permanent molars. Towards this effort, CBCT can provide the clinician with supplemental information about the different root canal configurations for successful Root Canal Treatment.

Citing Articles

Retrospective study of the morphology of third maxillary molars among the population of Lower Silesia based on analysis of cone beam computed tomography.

Olczyk A, Malicka B, Skoskiewicz-Malinowska K PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0299123.

PMID: 38394283 PMC: 10890766. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299123.


The morphology of permanent maxillary first molars evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography among a Yemeni population.

Mufadhal A, Madfa A BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):46.

PMID: 36703140 PMC: 9881305. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02752-2.


Location angle of second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molars of an Indian population: an in vivo retrospective CBCT evaluation and proposal of a new classification.

Vhorkate K, Banga K, Pawar A, Mir S, Arora S, Wahjuningrum D PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14234.

PMID: 36248703 PMC: 9559056. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14234.


Morphological Study of Root Canals of Maxillary Molars by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Magalhaes J, Velozo C, Albuquerque D, Soares C, Oliveira H, Pontual M ScientificWorldJournal. 2022; 2022:4766305.

PMID: 35087327 PMC: 8789463. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4766305.


Anatomical Evaluation of Root and Root Canal Configuration of Permanent Maxillary Dentition in the Population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Mashyakhy M, Awawdeh M, Abu-Melha A, Alotaibi B, Altuwaijri N, Alazzam N Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:3428229.

PMID: 35075425 PMC: 8783711. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3428229.


References
1.
Estrela C, Bueno M, Leles C, Azevedo B, Azevedo J . Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2008; 34(3):273-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023. View

2.
Silva E, Nejaim Y, Silva A, Haiter-Neto F, Zaia A, Cohenca N . Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2014; 40(2):173-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.002. View

3.
Badole G, Bahadure R, Warhadpande M, Kubde R . A rare root canal configuration of maxillary second molar: a case report. Case Rep Dent. 2012; 2012:767582. PMC: 3399371. DOI: 10.1155/2012/767582. View

4.
Al Shalabi R, Omer O, Glennon J, Jennings M, Claffey N . Root canal anatomy of maxillary first and second permanent molars. Int Endod J. 2001; 33(5):405-14. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00221.x. View

5.
Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer P . Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2010; 44(2):162-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01826.x. View