» Articles » PMID: 26457710

Assessment of Mental, Emotional and Physical Stress Through Analysis of Physiological Signals Using Smartphones

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2015 Oct 13
PMID 26457710
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Determining the stress level of a subject in real time could be of special interest in certain professional activities to allow the monitoring of soldiers, pilots, emergency personnel and other professionals responsible for human lives. Assessment of current mental fitness for executing a task at hand might avoid unnecessary risks. To obtain this knowledge, two physiological measurements were recorded in this work using customized non-invasive wearable instrumentation that measures electrocardiogram (ECG) and thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) signals. The relevant information from each measurement is extracted via evaluation of a reduced set of selected features. These features are primarily obtained from filtered and processed versions of the raw time measurements with calculations of certain statistical and descriptive parameters. Selection of the reduced set of features was performed using genetic algorithms, thus constraining the computational cost of the real-time implementation. Different classification approaches have been studied, but neural networks were chosen for this investigation because they represent a good tradeoff between the intelligence of the solution and computational complexity. Three different application scenarios were considered. In the first scenario, the proposed system is capable of distinguishing among different types of activity with a 21.2% probability error, for activities coded as neutral, emotional, mental and physical. In the second scenario, the proposed solution distinguishes among the three different emotional states of neutral, sadness and disgust, with a probability error of 4.8%. In the third scenario, the system is able to distinguish between low mental load and mental overload with a probability error of 32.3%. The computational cost was calculated, and the solution was implemented in commercially available Android-based smartphones. The results indicate that execution of such a monitoring solution is negligible compared to the nominal computational load of current smartphones.

Citing Articles

Current Strategies and Future Directions of Wearable Biosensors for Measuring Stress Biochemical Markers for Neuropsychiatric Applications.

Sheffield Z, Paul P, Krishnakumar S, Pan D Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(5):e2411339.

PMID: 39688117 PMC: 11791988. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202411339.


Predicting stress levels using physiological data: Real-time stress prediction models utilizing wearable devices.

Lazarou E, Exarchos T AIMS Neurosci. 2024; 11(2):76-102.

PMID: 38988886 PMC: 11230864. DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024006.


Towards a Contactless Stress Classification Using Thermal Imaging.

Gioia F, Greco A, Callara A, Scilingo E Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(3).

PMID: 35161722 PMC: 8839779. DOI: 10.3390/s22030976.


Wearable, Environmental, and Smartphone-Based Passive Sensing for Mental Health Monitoring.

Sheikh M, Qassem M, Kyriacou P Front Digit Health. 2021; 3:662811.

PMID: 34713137 PMC: 8521964. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.662811.


Associations Between Physiological Signals Captured Using Wearable Sensors and Self-reported Outcomes Among Adults in Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery: Development and Usability Study.

Alinia P, Sah R, McDonell M, Pendry P, Parent S, Ghasemzadeh H JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(7):e27891.

PMID: 34287205 PMC: 8339978. DOI: 10.2196/27891.


References
1.
Taylor S, Klein L, Lewis B, Gruenewald T, Gurung R, Updegraff J . Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev. 2000; 107(3):411-29. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.411. View

2.
Denot-Ledunois S, Vardon G, Perruchet P, Gallego J . The effect of attentional load on the breathing pattern in children. Int J Psychophysiol. 1998; 29(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00086-x. View

3.
Billman G . The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance. Front Physiol. 2013; 4:26. PMC: 3576706. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00026. View

4.
Turner J, Carroll D . Heart rate and oxygen consumption during mental arithmetic, a video game, and graded exercise: further evidence of metabolically-exaggerated cardiac adjustments?. Psychophysiology. 1985; 22(3):261-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01597.x. View

5.
McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tiller W, Rein G, Watkins A . The effects of emotions on short-term power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability . Am J Cardiol. 1995; 76(14):1089-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80309-9. View