» Articles » PMID: 26454726

Understanding Mental Health Service User Experiences of Restraint Through Debriefing: A Qualitative Analysis

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2015 Oct 12
PMID 26454726
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine debriefing data to understand experiences before, during, and after a restraint (seclusion, chemical, and physical) event from the perspective of inpatients at a large urban mental health and addiction hospital.

Method: Audits were conducted on a purposeful sample of inpatient charts containing post-restraint event inpatient debrief forms (n = 55). Qualitative data from the forms were analyzed thematically.

Results: Loss of autonomy and related anger, conflict with staff and other inpatients, and unmet needs were the most common factors precipitating restraint events. Inpatients often reported that increased communication with staff could have prevented restraint. Inpatients described having had various negative emotional states and responses during restraint events, including fear and rejection. Post-restraint, inpatients often desired to leave the unit for fresh air or to engage in leisure activities.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, our study is the first to use debriefing form data to explore mental health inpatients' experiences of restraint. Inpatients view restraint negatively and do not experience it as a therapeutic intervention. Debriefing, guided by a form, is useful for understanding the inpatient's experience of restraint, and should be used to re-establish the therapeutic relationship and to inform plans of care. In addition, individual and collective inpatient perspectives should inform alternatives to restraint.

Citing Articles

Characterizing the patient experience of physical restraint in psychiatric settings via a linguistic, sentiment, and metaphor analysis.

Nichini C, Barattieri di San Pietro C, Scalingi B, Alecci E, Toschi L, Cavallotti S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2111.

PMID: 39814805 PMC: 11735808. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83999-9.


Shared decision-making in post-coercion debriefing interventions in psychiatry - a scoping review.

Froelich K, Schurmann J, Huber C, Trachsel M Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1446619.

PMID: 39398960 PMC: 11466772. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1446619.


Factors and Processes Facilitating Recovery from Coercion in Mental Health Services-A Meta-Ethnography.

Berring L, Georgaca E, Hirsch S, Bilgin H, Akik B, Aydin M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38540592 PMC: 10970616. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12060628.


Experiences of Black Adults Evaluated in a Locked Psychiatric Emergency Unit: A Qualitative Study.

Smith C, Daley L, Lea C, Daniel K, Tweedy D, Thielman N Psychiatr Serv. 2023; 74(10):1063-1071.

PMID: 37042104 PMC: 10732806. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220533.


Patients' and staff members' experiences of restrictive practices in acute mental health in-patient settings: systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Butterworth H, Wood L, Rowe S BJPsych Open. 2022; 8(6):e178.

PMID: 36200350 PMC: 9634587. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.574.


References
1.
Raboch J, Kalisova L, Nawka A, Kitzlerova E, Onchev G, Karastergiou A . Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: findings from ten European countries. Psychiatr Serv. 2010; 61(10):1012-7. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012. View

2.
Cummings K, Grandfield S, Coldwell C . Caring with comfort rooms. Reducing seclusion and restraint use in psychiatric facilities. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010; 48(6):26-30. DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20100303-02. View

3.
Georgieva I, Mulder C, Wierdsma A . Patients' preference and experiences of forced medication and seclusion. Psychiatr Q. 2011; 83(1):1-13. PMC: 3289788. DOI: 10.1007/s11126-011-9178-y. View

4.
Bowers L, Ross J, Nijman H, Muir-Cochrane E, Noorthoorn E, Stewart D . The scope for replacing seclusion with time out in acute inpatient psychiatry in England. J Adv Nurs. 2011; 68(4):826-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05784.x. View

5.
Dack C, Ross J, Bowers L . The relationship between attitudes towards different containment measures and their usage in a national sample of psychiatric inpatients. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011; 19(7):577-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01832.x. View