» Articles » PMID: 26451948

Access to Orphan Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Legislations, Regulations and Policies in 35 Countries

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Oct 10
PMID 26451948
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To review existing regulations and policies utilised by countries to enable patient access to orphan drugs.

Methods: A review of the literature (1998 to 2014) was performed to identify relevant, peer-reviewed articles. Using content analysis, we synthesised regulations and policies for access to orphan drugs by type and by country.

Results: Fifty seven articles and 35 countries were included in this review. Six broad categories of regulation and policy instruments were identified: national orphan drug policies, orphan drug designation, marketing authorization, incentives, marketing exclusivity, and pricing and reimbursement. The availability of orphan drugs depends on individual country's legislation and regulations including national orphan drug policies, orphan drug designation, marketing authorization, marketing exclusivity and incentives such as tax credits to ensure research, development and marketing. The majority of countries (27/35) had in place orphan drug legislation. Access to orphan drugs depends on individual country's pricing and reimbursement policies, which varied widely between countries. High prices and insufficient evidence often limit orphan drugs from meeting the traditional health technology assessment criteria, especially cost-effectiveness, which may influence access.

Conclusions: Overall many countries have implemented a combination of legislations, regulations and policies for orphan drugs in the last two decades. While these may enable the availability and access to orphan drugs, there are critical differences between countries in terms of range and types of legislations, regulations and policies implemented. Importantly, China and India, two of the largest countries by population size, both lack national legislation for orphan medicines and rare diseases, which could have substantial negative impacts on their patient populations with rare diseases.

Citing Articles

Rare disease challenges and potential actions in the Middle East.

Fasseeh A, Korra N, Aljedai A, Seyam A, Almudaiheem H, Al-Abdulkarim H Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):56.

PMID: 40011905 PMC: 11863865. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02388-4.


Is Brazil following global trends in high-cost treatments? The case of Pompe Disease.

Bento Dos Santos B, de Oliveira Carvalho Faria C, Cirilo H, Dornelles A, de Oliveira Junior H, Schwartz I J Community Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39946071 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-025-00770-x.


Systematic Literature Review of Access Pathways to Drugs for Patients with Rare Diseases.

Vargas C, De Abreu Lourenco R, Espinoza M, Goodall S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024; 23(2):209-229.

PMID: 39731657 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00939-4.


Determinants of the Financial Impact of Orphan Drugs in Italy: Differences Between Expected and Observed Pharmaceutical Expenditure.

Mennini F, Cicchetti A, Sciattella P, Rumi F, Zanuzzi M, Carletto A Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024; 12(1):25-33.

PMID: 39644444 PMC: 11829855. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00463-w.


Mapping challenges in the accessibility of treatment products for urea cycle disorders: A survey of European healthcare professionals.

Stolwijk N, Haberle J, Huidekoper H, Wagenmakers M, Hollak C, Bosch A J Inherit Metab Dis. 2024; 48(1):e12815.

PMID: 39625308 PMC: 11670152. DOI: 10.1002/jimd.12815.


References
1.
Michel M, Toumi M . Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012; 12(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.95. View

2.
Drummond M, Wilson D, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J . Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007; 23(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307051550. View

3.
Joppi R, Bertele V, Garattini S . Orphan drugs, orphan diseases. The first decade of orphan drug legislation in the EU. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 69(4):1009-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1423-2. View

4.
Picavet E, Cassiman D, Simoens S . Reimbursement of orphan drugs in Belgium: what (else) matters?. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014; 9:139. PMC: 4172832. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-014-0139-z. View

5.
Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E . Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013; 8:198. PMC: 3882782. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-198. View