» Articles » PMID: 26447792

Stand-Alone Personalized Normative Feedback for College Student Drinkers: A Meta-Analytic Review, 2004 to 2014

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Oct 9
PMID 26447792
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Norms clarification has been identified as an effective component of college student drinking interventions, prompting research on norms clarification as a single-component intervention known as Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF). Previous reviews have examined PNF in combination with other components but not as a stand-alone intervention.

Objectives: To investigate the degree to which computer-delivered stand-alone personalized normative feedback interventions reduce alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms among college students and to compare gender-neutral and gender-specific PNF.

Data Sources: Electronic databases were searched systematically through November 2014. Reference lists were reviewed manually and forward and backward searches were conducted.

Selection Criteria: Outcome studies that compared computer-delivered, stand-alone PNF intervention with an assessment only, attention-matched, or active treatment control and reported alcohol use and harms among college students.

Methods: Between-group effect sizes were calculated as the standardized mean difference in change scores between treatment and control groups divided by pooled standard deviation. Within-group effect sizes were calculated as the raw mean difference between baseline and follow-up divided by pooled within-groups standard deviation.

Results: Eight studies (13 interventions) with a total of 2,050 participants were included. Compared to control participants, students who received gender-neutral (dbetween = 0.291, 95% CI [0.159, 0.423]) and gender-specific PNF (dbetween = 0.284, 95% CI [0.117, 0.451]) reported greater reductions in drinking from baseline to follow-up. Students who received gender-neutral PNF reported 3.027 (95% CI [2.171, 3.882]) fewer drinks per week at first follow-up and gender-specific PNF reported 3.089 (95% CI [0.992, 5.186]) fewer drinks. Intervention effects were small for harms (dbetween = 0.157, 95% CI [0.037, 0.278]).

Conclusions: Computer-delivered PNF is an effective stand-alone approach for reducing college student drinking and has a small impact on alcohol-related harms. Effects are small but clinically relevant when considered from a public health perspective. Additional research is needed to examine computer-delivered, stand-alone PNF as a population-level prevention program.

Citing Articles

The Effectiveness of Universal Educational Interventions for Prevention of Illicit Drug Use among University Students: A Systematic Review.

Ghani K, Gholami J, Mousavian G, Amin-Esmaeili M, Rafiey H, Vousooghi N Iran J Public Health. 2024; 53(1):48-58.

PMID: 38694864 PMC: 11058395. DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v53i1.14682.


A pilot study of the acceptability, efficacy, and iatrogenic effects of a brief dynamic norms intervention for reducing young adult alcohol use.

Graupensperger S, Jaffe A, Blayney J, Duckworth J, Stappenbeck C Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023; 47(12):2331-2342.

PMID: 38078844 PMC: 10841674. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15202.


College men's use of protective behavioral strategies for sexual aggression, risky sexual behavior, and heavy episodic drinking.

Treat T, Viken R, Westemeier O, Corbin W Psychol Addict Behav. 2023; 38(3):360-371.

PMID: 37956027 PMC: 11065594. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000965.


Behavior change versus stability during the college-to-work transition: Life course and the "stickiness" of alcohol misuse at career entry.

Liu S, Bamberger P, Wang M, Nahum-Shani I, Larimer M, Bacharach S Pers Psychol. 2023; 76(3):945-975.

PMID: 37745943 PMC: 10513095. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12519.


Awareness of peers in recovery and of a campus collegiate recovery community at a university in the southeastern United States.

Jurinsky J, Perkins J, Satinsky E, Finch A J Am Coll Health. 2023; 73(1):197-203.

PMID: 37290002 PMC: 10703996. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2209196.


References
1.
Baer J, Stacy A, Larimer M . Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. J Stud Alcohol. 1991; 52(6):580-6. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580. View

2.
Walters S . In praise of feedback: an effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers. J Am Coll Health. 2000; 48(5):235-8. DOI: 10.1080/07448480009599310. View

3.
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H . A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 1(2):97-111. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.12. View

4.
Neighbors C, Jensen M, Tidwell J, Walter T, Fossos N, Lewis M . Social-norms interventions for light and nondrinking students. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2016; 14(5):651-669. PMC: 4945125. DOI: 10.1177/1368430210398014. View

5.
Hedges L, Pigott T . The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 2001; 6(3):203-17. View