» Articles » PMID: 26447712

Sharing Neuron Data: Carrots, Sticks, and Digital Records

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Oct 9
PMID 26447712
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Routine data sharing is greatly benefiting several scientific disciplines, such as molecular biology, particle physics, and astronomy. Neuroscience data, in contrast, are still rarely shared, greatly limiting the potential for secondary discovery and the acceleration of research progress. Although the attitude toward data sharing is non-uniform across neuroscience subdomains, widespread adoption of data sharing practice will require a cultural shift in the community. Digital reconstructions of axonal and dendritic morphology constitute a particularly "sharable" kind of data. The popularity of the public repository NeuroMorpho.Org demonstrates that data sharing can benefit both users and contributors. Increased data availability is also catalyzing the grassroots development and spontaneous integration of complementary resources, research tools, and community initiatives. Even in this rare successful subfield, however, more data are still unshared than shared. Our experience as developers and curators of NeuroMorpho.Org suggests that greater transparency regarding the expectations and consequences of sharing (or not sharing) data, combined with public disclosure of which datasets are shared and which are not, may expedite the transition to community-wide data sharing.

Citing Articles

Accelerating the continuous community sharing of digital neuromorphology data.

Tecuatl C, Ljungquist B, Ascoli G FASEB Bioadv. 2024; 6(7):207-221.

PMID: 38974113 PMC: 11226999. DOI: 10.1096/fba.2024-00048.


Automating literature screening and curation with applications to computational neuroscience.

Ji Z, Guo S, Qiao Y, McDougal R J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(7):1463-1470.

PMID: 38722233 PMC: 11187430. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae097.


German funders' data sharing policies-A qualitative interview study.

Anger M, Wendelborn C, Schickhardt C PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0296956.

PMID: 38330079 PMC: 10852319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296956.


Tissue Oxygen Depth Explorer: an interactive database for microscopic oxygen imaging data.

Amra L, Machler P, Fomin-Thunemann N, Kilic K, Saisan P, Devor A Front Neuroinform. 2023; 17:1278787.

PMID: 38088985 PMC: 10711099. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1278787.


Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharing.

Emissah H, Ljungquist B, Ascoli G Bioinformatics. 2023; 39(12).

PMID: 38070153 PMC: 10733721. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad746.


References
1.
Sejnowski T, Churchland P, Movshon J . Putting big data to good use in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(11):1440-1. PMC: 4224030. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3839. View

2.
Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N . The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol. 2013; 11(10):e1001675. PMC: 3792863. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675. View

3.
Kasthuri N, Hayworth K, Berger D, Schalek R, Conchello J, Knowles-Barley S . Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex. Cell. 2015; 162(3):648-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054. View

4.
Kennedy D . Where's the beef ? Missing data in the information age. Neuroinformatics. 2006; 4(4):271-3. DOI: 10.1385/NI:4:4:271. View

5.
Liu Y . The DIADEM and beyond. Neuroinformatics. 2011; 9(2-3):99-102. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-011-9102-5. View