» Articles » PMID: 26446309

Stacked Thin Layers of Metaphase Chromatin Explain the Geometry of Chromosome Rearrangements and Banding

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Oct 9
PMID 26446309
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The three-dimensional organization of tightly condensed chromatin within metaphase chromosomes has been one of the most challenging problems in structural biology since the discovery of the nucleosome. This study shows that chromosome images obtained from typical banded karyotypes and from different multicolour cytogenetic analyses can be used to gain information about the internal structure of chromosomes. Chromatin bands and the connection surfaces in sister chromatid exchanges and in cancer translocations are planar and orthogonal to the chromosome axis. Chromosome stretching produces band splitting and even the thinnest bands are orthogonal and well defined, indicating that short stretches of DNA can occupy completely the chromosome cross-section. These observations impose strong physical constraints on models that attempt to explain chromatin folding in chromosomes. The thin-plate model, which consists of many stacked layers of planar chromatin perpendicular to the chromosome axis, is compatible with the observed orientation of bands, with the existence of thin bands, and with band splitting; it is also compatible with the orthogonal orientation and planar geometry of the connection surfaces in chromosome rearrangements. The results obtained provide a consistent interpretation of the chromosome structural properties that are used in clinical cytogenetics for the diagnosis of hereditary diseases and cancers.

Citing Articles

Hypothesis: The opposing pulling forces exerted by spindle microtubules can cause sliding of chromatin layers and facilitate sister chromatid resolution.

Daban J Front Genet. 2023; 14:1321260.

PMID: 38075677 PMC: 10704366. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1321260.


Differentially accessible, single copy sequences form contiguous domains along metaphase chromosomes that are conserved among multiple tissues.

Hill S, Rogan P, Wang Y, Knoll J Mol Cytogenet. 2021; 14(1):49.

PMID: 34670606 PMC: 8527651. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-021-00567-w.


Scaling Laws for Mitotic Chromosomes.

Kramer E, Tayjasanant P, Cordone B Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:684278.

PMID: 34249936 PMC: 8262490. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.684278.


Bridging chromatin structure and function over a range of experimental spatial and temporal scales by molecular modeling.

Portillo-Ledesma S, Schlick T Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2021; 10(2).

PMID: 34046090 PMC: 8153366. DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1434.


Surface structures consisting of chromatin fibers in isolated barley (Hordeum vulgare) chromosomes revealed by helium ion microscopy.

Sartsanga C, Phengchat R, Fukui K, Wako T, Ohmido N Chromosome Res. 2021; 29(1):81-94.

PMID: 33615407 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-021-09649-2.


References
1.
Schrock E, Du Manoir S, Veldman T, Schoell B, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith M . Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science. 1996; 273(5274):494-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5274.494. View

2.
Daban J . Physical constraints in the condensation of eukaryotic chromosomes. Local concentration of DNA versus linear packing ratio in higher order chromatin structures. Biochemistry. 2000; 39(14):3861-6. DOI: 10.1021/bi992628w. View

3.
Cui Y, Bustamante C . Pulling a single chromatin fiber reveals the forces that maintain its higher-order structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(1):127-32. PMC: 26627. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.127. View

4.
Cheung V, Nowak N, Jang W, Kirsch I, Zhao S, Chen X . Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2001; 409(6822):953-8. PMC: 7845515. DOI: 10.1038/35057192. View

5.
Levy S, Sutton G, Ng P, Feuk L, Halpern A, Walenz B . The diploid genome sequence of an individual human. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(10):e254. PMC: 1964779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050254. View