» Articles » PMID: 26441771

Electrophysiology of Subject-verb Agreement Mediated by Speakers' Gender

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Oct 7
PMID 26441771
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An important property of speech is that it explicitly conveys features of a speaker's identity such as age or gender. This event-related potential (ERP) study examined the effects of social information provided by a speaker's gender, i.e., the conceptual representation of gender, on subject-verb agreement. Despite numerous studies on agreement, little is known about syntactic computations generated by speaker characteristics extracted from the acoustic signal. Slovak is well suited to investigate this issue because it is a morphologically rich language in which agreement involves features for number, case, and gender. Grammaticality of a sentence can be evaluated by checking a speaker's gender as conveyed by his/her voice. We examined how conceptual information about speaker gender, which is not syntactic but rather social and pragmatic in nature, is interpreted for the computation of agreement patterns. ERP responses to verbs disagreeing with the speaker's gender (e.g., a sentence including a masculine verbal inflection spoken by a female person 'the neighbors were upset because I (∗)stoleMASC plums') elicited a larger early posterior negativity compared to correct sentences. When the agreement was purely syntactic and did not depend on the speaker's gender, a disagreement between a formally marked subject and the verb inflection (e.g., the womanFEM (∗)stoleMASC plums) resulted in a larger P600 preceded by a larger anterior negativity compared to the control sentences. This result is in line with proposals according to which the recruitment of non-syntactic information such as the gender of the speaker results in N400-like effects, while formally marked syntactic features lead to structural integration as reflected in a LAN/P600 complex.

Citing Articles

Neurophysiological correlates of automatic integration of voice and gender information during grammatical processing.

Alekseeva M, Myachykov A, Bermudez-Margaretto B, Shtyrov Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13114.

PMID: 35908074 PMC: 9339001. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14478-2.


Are Second Person Masculine Generics Easier to Process for Men than for Women? Evidence from Polish.

Szuba A, Redl T, de Hoop H J Psycholinguist Res. 2022; 51(4):819-845.

PMID: 35303215 PMC: 9338112. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09859-7.


Do faces speak volumes? Social expectations in speech comprehension and evaluation across three age groups.

Hanulikova A PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0259230.

PMID: 34710176 PMC: 8553087. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259230.


Individual Differences in Political Ideology and Disgust Sensitivity Affect Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension.

Hubert Lyall I, Jarvikivi J Front Psychol. 2021; 12:699071.

PMID: 34707531 PMC: 8542873. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699071.


An EEG Analysis of Honorification in Japanese: Human Hierarchical Relationships Coded in Language.

Tokimoto S, Miyaoka Y, Tokimoto N Front Psychol. 2021; 12:549839.

PMID: 33762986 PMC: 7982684. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.549839.


References
1.
Kutas M, Hillyard S . Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 1980; 207(4427):203-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.7350657. View

2.
van Berkum J, Brown C, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P . Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(3):443-67. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443. View

3.
Mancini S, Molinaro N, Rizzi L, Carreiras M . A person is not a number: discourse involvement in subject-verb agreement computation. Brain Res. 2011; 1410:64-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.055. View

4.
Irmen L, Holt D, Weisbrod M . Effects of role typicality on processing person information in German: evidence from an ERP study. Brain Res. 2010; 1353:133-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.018. View

5.
Ye Z, Luo Y, Friederici A, Zhou X . Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res. 2006; 1071(1):186-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.085. View