» Articles » PMID: 26436208

A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery

Abstract

Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is reported to reduce biomarkers of ischemic and reperfusion injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but uncertainty about clinical outcomes remains.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving adults who were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass under total anesthesia with intravenous propofol. The trial compared upper-limb RIPC with a sham intervention. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or acute renal failure up to the time of hospital discharge. Secondary end points included the occurrence of any individual component of the primary end point by day 90.

Results: A total of 1403 patients underwent randomization. The full analysis set comprised 1385 patients (692 in the RIPC group and 693 in the sham-RIPC group). There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of the composite primary end point (99 patients [14.3%] in the RIPC group and 101 [14.6%] in the sham-RIPC group, P=0.89) or of any of the individual components: death (9 patients [1.3%] and 4 [0.6%], respectively; P=0.21), myocardial infarction (47 [6.8%] and 63 [9.1%], P=0.12), stroke (14 [2.0%] and 15 [2.2%], P=0.79), and acute renal failure (42 [6.1%] and 35 [5.1%], P=0.45). The results were similar in the per-protocol analysis. No treatment effect was found in any subgroup analysis. No significant differences between the RIPC group and the sham-RIPC group were seen in the level of troponin release, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the intensive care unit or the hospital, new onset of atrial fibrillation, and the incidence of postoperative delirium. No RIPC-related adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: Upper-limb RIPC performed while patients were under propofol-induced anesthesia did not show a relevant benefit among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. (Funded by the German Research Foundation; RIPHeart ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01067703.).

Citing Articles

Caveolin-3: therapeutic target for diabetic myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Wen X, Ji Y, Tang H, Jin Z, Su W, Zhou L Mol Med. 2025; 31(1):80.

PMID: 40012041 PMC: 11866611. DOI: 10.1186/s10020-025-01117-5.


2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.

Wahba A, Kunst G, De Somer F, Kildahl H, Milne B, Kjellberg G Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 67(2).

PMID: 39949326 PMC: 11826095. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae354.


2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.

Wahba A, Kunst G, De Somer F, Kildahl H, Milne B, Kjellberg G Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025; 40(2).

PMID: 39949317 PMC: 11826094. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf002.


Remote ischemic preconditioning during cardiac surgery. What does the future hold?.

Abraham A, Abraham M, Abraham J, Samuel A Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2025; 56(5):316-317.

PMID: 39917981 PMC: 11781301. DOI: 10.5114/ait.2024.146731.


Entering the new digital era of intensive care medicine: an overview of interdisciplinary approaches to use artificial intelligence for patients' benefit.

Old O, Friedrichson B, Zacharowski K, Kloka J Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2025; 2(1):e0014.

PMID: 39916758 PMC: 11783618. DOI: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000014.