» Articles » PMID: 2643544

A Histometric Analysis of Chronically Rejected Human Liver Allografts: Insights into the Mechanisms of Bile Duct Loss: Direct Immunologic and Ischemic Factors

Overview
Journal Hepatology
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1989 Feb 1
PMID 2643544
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conspicuous pathologic features of chronic liver allograft rejection include bile duct loss and chronic obliterative arteriopathy. A quantitative histometric analysis was performed to document the extent of bile duct loss, the size of the "vanished" ducts and the extent of chronic obliterative arteriopathy and to determine whether there was any relationship between chronic obliterative arteriopathy and bile duct loss. All failed liver allograft specimens with chronic rejection were reviewed and categorized according to the degree of chronic obliterative arteriopathy, assessed by the degree of luminal narrowing of hilar hepatic artery branches. Histometric analysis of the grafts revealed: (i) there was a loss of small portal arterioles (less than 35 microns); (ii) bile ducts which should accompany arteries less than 35, 35 to 54 or 55 to 74 microns in diameter were missing, with the greatest decrease occurring among the smallest ducts; (iii) bile duct loss was seen in the absence of significant large vessel chronic obliterative arteriopathy, and (iv) the severity of arteriole and bile duct loss, as well as the size of the vanished ducts, was directly proportional to the degree of chronic obliterative arteriopathy. Furthermore, the size of the "vanished" bile ducts in liver allografts appeared to differ from the size of ducts destroyed in primary biliary cirrhosis. These studies offer indirect, but suggestive proof that two mechanisms are operative in the bile duct loss seen in chronic rejection: direct lymphocytotoxicity and ischemic damage.

Citing Articles

Rejection in Liver Transplantation Recipients.

Maddur H, Wilson N, Patil P, Asrani S J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024; 14(4):101363.

PMID: 38495462 PMC: 10943490. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101363.


HLA class II donor specific antibodies are associated with graft cirrhosis after liver transplant independent of the mean fluorescence intensity level.

Willuweit K, Frey A, Bieniek L, Heinold A, Buchter M, Horn P BMC Gastroenterol. 2020; 20(1):288.

PMID: 32854625 PMC: 7457295. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01427-4.


Impact of machine perfusion of the liver on post-transplant biliary complications: A systematic review.

Boteon Y, Boteon A, Attard J, Wallace L, Bhogal R, Afford S World J Transplant. 2018; 8(6):220-231.

PMID: 30370232 PMC: 6201326. DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i6.220.


Late liver function test abnormalities post-adult liver transplantation: a review of the etiology, investigation, and management.

Mitchell O, Cosar A, Malik M, Gurakar A Hepatol Int. 2015; 10(1):106-14.

PMID: 26603541 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-015-9685-2.


Abnormal Localization of STK17A in Bile Canaliculi in Liver Allografts: An Early Sign of Chronic Rejection.

Ozeki M, Salah A, Aini W, Tamaki K, Haga H, Miyagawa-Hayashino A PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0136381.

PMID: 26305096 PMC: 4549187. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136381.


References
1.
FENNELL Jr R, Vierling J . Electron microscopy of rejected human liver allografts. Hepatology. 1985; 5(6):1083-7. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840050604. View

2.
Hubscher S, Clements D, Elias E, McMaster P . Biopsy findings in cases of rejection of liver allograft. J Clin Pathol. 1985; 38(12):1366-73. PMC: 499494. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.38.12.1366. View

3.
Fung J, Zeevi A, Starzl T, Demetris J, Iwatsuki S, Duquesnoy R . Functional characterization of infiltrating T lymphocytes in human hepatic allografts. Hum Immunol. 1986; 16(2):182-99. PMC: 3005262. DOI: 10.1016/0198-8859(86)90047-9. View

4.
White R, Zajko A, Demetris A, BRON K, Dekker A, Starzl T . Liver transplant rejection: angiographic findings in 35 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 148(6):1095-8. PMC: 3005375. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.6.1095. View

5.
Billingham M . Cardiac transplant atherosclerosis. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19(4 Suppl 5):19-25. View