» Articles » PMID: 26435386

Endometriosis Diagnosis and Staging by Operating Surgeon and Expert Review Using Multiple Diagnostic Tools: an Inter-rater Agreement Study

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2015 Oct 6
PMID 26435386
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine agreement on endometriosis diagnosis between real-time laparoscopy and subsequent expert review of digital images, operative reports, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and histopathology, viewed sequentially.

Design: Inter-rater agreement study.

Setting: Five urban surgical centres.

Population: Women, aged 18-44 years, who underwent a laparoscopy regardless of clinical indication. A random sample of 105 women with and 43 women without a postoperative endometriosis diagnosis was obtained from the ENDO study.

Methods: Laparoscopies were diagnosed, digitally recorded, and reassessed.

Main Outcome Measures: Inter-observer agreement of endometriosis diagnosis and staging according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine criteria. Prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa values (κ) were calculated for diagnosis, and weighted κ values were calculated for staging.

Results: Surgeons and expert reviewers had substantial agreement on diagnosis and staging after viewing digital images (n = 148; mean κ = 0.67, range 0.61-0.69; mean κ = 0.64, range 0.53-0.78, respectively) and after additionally viewing operative reports (n = 148; mean κ = 0.88, range 0.85-0.89; mean κ = 0.85, range 0.84-0.86, respectively). Although additionally viewing MRI findings (n = 36) did not greatly impact agreement, agreement substantially decreased after viewing histological findings (n = 67), with expert reviewers changing their assessment from a positive to a negative diagnosis in up to 20% of cases.

Conclusion: Although these findings suggest that misclassification bias in the diagnosis or staging of endometriosis via visualised disease is minimal, they should alert gynaecologists who review operative images in order to make decisions on endometriosis treatment that operative reports/drawings and histopathology, but not necessarily MRI, will improve their ability to make sound judgments.

Tweetable Abstract: Endometriosis diagnosis and staging agreement between expert reviewers and operating surgeons was substantial.

Citing Articles

A Narrative Review Regarding Implication of Ovarian Endometriomas in Infertility.

Vaduva C, Dira L, Boldeanu L, Serbanescu M, Carp-Veliscu A Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003570 PMC: 11856244. DOI: 10.3390/life15020161.


Is endometriosis typology a potentially better classification system for assessing risk of female infertility?.

Schliep K, Pollack A, Farland L, Shaaban M, Yan B, Wang J F S Rep. 2025; 5(4):394-401.

PMID: 39781080 PMC: 11705600. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.08.009.


Validation of administrative health data for the identification of endometriosis diagnosis.

Kiser A, Hemmert R, Myrer R, Bucher B, Eilbeck K, Varner M Hum Reprod. 2024; 40(2):289-295.

PMID: 39704741 PMC: 11788219. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae281.


The Hallmarks of Endometriosis.

Psilopatis I, Burghaus S, Au K, Hofbeck L, Windischbauer L, Lotz L Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024; 84(6):555-563.

PMID: 38884026 PMC: 11175833. DOI: 10.1055/a-2306-8759.


The Effect of Polyphenols Extract in Induced Endometriosis in Rats.

Jianu E, Pop R, Gherman L, Ranga F, Levai A, Rus V Molecules. 2024; 29(4).

PMID: 38398530 PMC: 10893551. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29040778.


References
1.
Balasch J, Creus M, Fabregues F, Carmona F, Ordi J, Martinez-Roman S . Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11(2):387-91. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/11.2.387. View

2.
Rock J . The revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: reproducibility of scoring. ZOLADEX Endometriosis Study Group. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63(5):1108-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57556-6. View

3.
Sim J, Wright C . The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005; 85(3):257-68. View

4.
Moen M, Halvorsen T . Histologic confirmation of endometriosis in different peritoneal lesions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1992; 71(5):337-42. DOI: 10.3109/00016349209021069. View

5.
Buck Louis G, Hediger M, Peterson C, Croughan M, Sundaram R, Stanford J . Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(2):360-5. PMC: 3143230. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.087. View