» Articles » PMID: 26432680

Clinical and Cosmetic Outcomes in Patients Treated with High-dose-rate Electronic Brachytherapy for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2015 Oct 4
PMID 26432680
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze clinical and cosmetic outcomes in patients treated for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) with high-dose-rate (HDR) electronic brachytherapy (EBT) using surface applicators.

Methods And Materials: We identified 127 patients who had 154 NMSC lesions, 149 of which were basal cell carcinoma, treated with HDR EBT at our institution between July 2012 and March 2014. Lesions were treated to 40 Gy in 8 fractions. Local control, acute toxicity, late toxicity, and cosmetic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Acute and late toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Cosmetic outcomes were graded using a standard scale based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema.

Results: Median (range) follow-up from completion of treatment was 16.1 (3.4-34.8 months). The overall crude recurrence rate was 1.3% (n = 2). Grade 0 to 1 acute radiation dermatitis was observed in 52.6% of treated lesions (n = 81), grade 2 in 34.4% (n = 53), and grade 3 in 13.0% (n = 20). No acute toxicity greater than grade 3 was observed and all acute toxic events resolved after treatment. Grade 0 to 1 late toxicity was observed in 94.2% of cases (n = 145), and grade 2 in 5.8% (n = 9). No late toxicity greater than grade 2 was observed. Across the 152 controlled lesions, cosmetic results were excellent in 94.2% of treated lesions (n = 145), good in 3.3% (n = 5), fair in 0.7% (n = 1), and poor in 0.7% (n = 1).

Conclusions: HDR EBT confers promising local control, minimal toxicity, and excellent cosmesis in our institutional experience. It should be considered ideal for NMSC of the head and neck, particularly for basal cell carcinoma involving central facial locations where surgical cosmesis may be inferior.

Citing Articles

Long-term clinical outcomes of non-melanoma skin cancer patients treated with electronic brachytherapy.

Doggett S, Willoughby M, Miller K, Mafong E J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2023; 15(1):9-14.

PMID: 36970438 PMC: 10034722. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2023.125580.


A Multicenter Prospective Trial of Electronic Skin Surface Brachytherapy for Keratinocyte Carcinoma: Early Cosmesis, Quality of Life, and Adverse Events.

Kuo A, Lee E, Rossi A, Nehal K, Cordova M, Steckler A Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022; 116(3):544-550.

PMID: 36586493 PMC: 10686635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.032.


The State of the Art of Radiotherapy for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Benkhaled S, Van Gestel D, Gomes Da Silveira Cauduro C, Palumbo S, Del Marmol V, Desmet A Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:913269.

PMID: 35833108 PMC: 9272768. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.913269.


High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas on Sensitive Areas of the Face: A Report of Clinical Outcomes and Acute and Subacute Toxicities.

Taylor J, Dasgeb B, Liem S, Ali A, Harrison A, Finkelstein M Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021; 6(2):100616.

PMID: 33912732 PMC: 8071728. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.028.


Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for superficial skin irradiation with significant curvature in one or more planes.

Wills R, Lowe G, Jones C, Hoskin P Strahlenther Onkol. 2021; 197(6):547-554.

PMID: 33791816 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01759-4.