» Articles » PMID: 26430006

A Longitudinal Study of MARS MRI Scanning of Soft-tissue Lesions Around Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasties and Disease Progression

Overview
Journal Bone Joint J
Date 2015 Oct 3
PMID 26430006
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the changes seen on serial metal artefact reduction magnetic resonance imaging scans (MARS-MRI) of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (MoM THAs). In total 155 THAs, in 35 male and 100 female patients (mean age 70.4 years, 42 to 91), underwent at least two MRI scans at a mean interval of 14.6 months (2.6 to 57.1), at a mean of 48.2 months (3.5 to 93.3) after primary hip surgery. Scans were graded using a modification of the Oxford classification. Progression of disease was defined as an increase in grade or a minimum 10% increase in fluid lesion volume at second scan. A total of 16 hips (30%) initially classified as 'normal' developed an abnormality on the second scan. Of those with 'isolated trochanteric fluid' 9 (47%) underwent disease progression, as did 7 (58%) of 'effusions'. A total of 54 (77%) of hips initially classified as showing adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) progressed, with higher rates of progression in higher grades. Disease progression was associated with high blood cobalt levels or an irregular pseudocapsule lining at the initial scan. There was no association with changes in functional scores. Adverse reactions to metal debris in MoM THAs may not be as benign as previous reports have suggested. Close radiological follow-up is recommended, particularly in high-risk groups.

Citing Articles

Revealing Inflammatory Indications Induced by Titanium Alloy Wear Debris in Periprosthetic Tissue by Label-Free Correlative High-Resolution Ion, Electron and Optical Microspectroscopy.

Podlipec R, Punzon-Quijorna E, Pirker L, Kelemen M, Vavpetic P, Kavalar R Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(11).

PMID: 34205030 PMC: 8199876. DOI: 10.3390/ma14113048.


Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.

Matharu G, Eskelinen A, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray D Acta Orthop. 2018; 89(3):278-288.

PMID: 29493348 PMC: 6055775. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1440455.


What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?.

Matharu G, Judge A, Eskelinen A, Murray D, Pandit H Acta Orthop. 2017; 89(1):29-39.

PMID: 29105547 PMC: 5810829. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1398011.


Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.

Moliere S, Dillenseger J, Ehlinger M, Kremer S, Bierry G Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 46(9):1209-1217.

PMID: 28540521 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2670-1.