» Articles » PMID: 26426062

On the Recent Use of Membrane Technology for Olive Mill Wastewater Purification

Overview
Date 2015 Oct 2
PMID 26426062
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many reclamation treatments as well as integrated processes for the purification of olive mill wastewaters (OMW) have already been proposed and developed but not led to completely satisfactory results, principally due to complexity or cost-ineffectiveness. The olive oil industry in its current status, composed of little and dispersed factories, cannot stand such high costs. Moreover, these treatments are not able to abate the high concentration of dissolved inorganic matter present in these highly polluted effluents. In the present work, a review on the actual state of the art concerning the treatment and disposal of OMW by membranes is addressed, comprising microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and reverse osmosis (RO), as well as membrane bioreactors (MBR) and non-conventional membrane processes such as vacuum distillation (VD), osmotic distillation (OD) and forward osmosis (FO). Membrane processes are becoming extensively used to replace many conventional processes in the purification of water and groundwater as well as in the reclamation of wastewater streams of very diverse sources, such as those generated by agro-industrial activities. Moreover, a brief insight into inhibition and control of fouling by properly-tailored pretreatment processes upstream the membrane operation and the use of the critical and threshold flux theories is provided.

Citing Articles

A New Approach for Bioremediation of Olive Mill Wastewaters: Combination of Straw Filtration and Nanofiltration.

Chidichimo F, Basile M, Conidi C, De Filpo G, Morelli R, Cassano A Membranes (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392665 PMC: 10890137. DOI: 10.3390/membranes14020038.


Concentration of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds in Olive Mill Wastewater by Direct Contact Membrane Distillation.

Tundis R, Conidi C, Loizzo M, Sicari V, Romeo R, Cassano A Molecules. 2021; 26(6).

PMID: 33806935 PMC: 8004892. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26061808.


Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewater through Integrated Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes.

Bottino A, Capannelli G, Comite A, Costa C, Firpo R, Jezowska A Membranes (Basel). 2020; 10(11).

PMID: 33187114 PMC: 7697980. DOI: 10.3390/membranes10110334.


Treatment of Two-Phase Olive Mill Wastewater and Recovery of Phenolic Compounds Using Membrane Technology.

Sygouni V, Pantziaros A, Iakovides I, Sfetsa E, Bogdou P, Christoforou E Membranes (Basel). 2019; 9(2).

PMID: 30764563 PMC: 6410305. DOI: 10.3390/membranes9020027.


Assessment of a New Silicon Carbide Tubular Honeycomb Membrane for Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewaters.

Fraga M, Sanches S, Crespo J, Pereira V Membranes (Basel). 2017; 7(1).

PMID: 28264453 PMC: 5371973. DOI: 10.3390/membranes7010012.


References
1.
Field R, Pearce G . Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2011; 164(1-2):38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.008. View

2.
Stasinakis A, Elia I, Petalas A, Halvadakis C . Removal of total phenols from olive-mill wastewater using an agricultural by-product, olive pomace. J Hazard Mater. 2008; 160(2-3):408-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.012. View

3.
Grafias P, Xekoukoulotakis N, Mantzavinos D, Diamadopoulos E . Pilot treatment of olive pomace leachate by vertical-flow constructed wetland and electrochemical oxidation: an efficient hybrid process. Water Res. 2010; 44(9):2773-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.015. View

4.
Harvey P, Campanella B, Castro P, Harms H, Lichtfouse E, Schaffner A . Phytoremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, anilines and phenols. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2002; 9(1):29-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF02987315. View

5.
Bais H, Walker T, Stermitz F, Hufbauer R, Vivanco J . Enantiomeric-dependent phytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of (+/-)-catechin. A rhizosecreted racemic mixture from spotted knapweed. Plant Physiol. 2002; 128(4):1173-9. DOI: 10.1104/pp.011019. View