» Articles » PMID: 26424232

Partner-based Adherence Intervention for Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy (ACTG A5234): a Multinational Randomised Trial

Abstract

Background: Adherence is key to the success of antiretroviral therapy. Enhanced partner support might benefit patients with previous treatment failure. We aimed to assess whether an enhanced partner-based support intervention with modified directly observed therapy would improve outcomes with second-line therapy in HIV-infected patients for whom first-line therapy had failed.

Methods: We did a multicentre, international, randomised clinical trial at nine sites in Botswana, Brazil, Haiti, Peru, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Participants aged 18 years or older for whom first-line therapy had failed, with HIV RNA concentrations greater than 1000 copies per mL and with a willing partner, were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated randomisation, to receive partner-based modified directly observed therapy or standard of care. Randomisation was stratified by screening HIV RNA concentration (≤10 000 copies per mL vs >10 000 copies per mL). Participants and site investigators were not masked to group assignment. Primary outcome was confirmed virological failure (viral load >400 copies per mL) by week 48. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00608569.

Findings: Between April 23, 2009, and Sept 29, 2011, we randomly assigned 259 participants to the modified directly observed therapy group (n=129) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). 34 (26%) participants in the modified directly observed therapy group achieved the primary endpoint of virological failure by week 48 compared with 23 (18%) participants in the standard-of-care group. The Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative probability of virological failure by week 48 was 25·1% (95% CI 17·7-32·4) in the modified directly observed therapy group and 17·3% (10·8-23·7) in the standard-of-care group, for a weighted difference in standard of care versus modified directly observed therapy of -6·6% (95% CI -16·5% to 3·2%; p=0·19). 36 (14%) participants reported at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event or laboratory abnormality (n=21 in the modified directly observed therapy group and n=15 in the standard-of-care group).

Interpretation: Partner-based training with modified directly observed therapy had no effect on virological suppression. The intervention does not therefore seem to be a promising strategy to increase adherence. Intensive follow-up with clinic staff might be a viable approach in this setting.

Funding: AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health.

Citing Articles

Pilot Test of Mopati, a Multi-Level Adherence Intervention for People Living with HIV and Their Treatment Partners in Botswana.

Bogart L, Phaladze N, Kgotlaetsile K, Klein D, Goggin K, Mosepele M Int J Behav Med. 2023; 31(5):787-798.

PMID: 37957535 PMC: 11089073. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-023-10233-7.


Incidence and Predictors of Pregnancy in Women Enrolled in Large Multinational HIV Treatment Trials of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

Omoz-Oarhe A, Hughes M, Yajing B, Short W, Mngqibisa R, Cohn S J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2023; 94(5):461-467.

PMID: 37820116 PMC: 10811622. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003299.


Study protocol: Strengthening understanding of effective adherence strategies for first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in selected rural and urban communities in South Africa.

Gumede S, de Wit J, Venter W, Lalla-Edward S PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261107.

PMID: 34932588 PMC: 8691643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261107.


Participants Switching to Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy with Susceptible Virus Display Inferior Adherence and Worse Outcomes: An Observational Analysis.

Mantshonyane L, Roy J, Levy M, Wallis C, Bar K, Godfrey C AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2021; 35(12):467-473.

PMID: 34788110 PMC: 8905302. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2021.0115.


Understanding adherence in virally suppressed and unsuppressed human immunodeficiency virus-positive urban patients on second-line antiretroviral treatment.

Gumede S, Venter W, Lalla-Edward S South Afr J HIV Med. 2020; 21(1):1107.

PMID: 32934834 PMC: 7479367. DOI: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v21i1.1107.


References
1.
Farmer K . Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clin Ther. 1999; 21(6):1074-90; discussion 1073. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(99)80026-5. View

2.
Paterson D, Swindells S, Mohr J, BRESTER M, Vergis E, Squier C . Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133(1):21-30. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00004. View

3.
Gross R, Bilker W, Friedman H, Strom B . Effect of adherence to newly initiated antiretroviral therapy on plasma viral load. AIDS. 2001; 15(16):2109-17. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200111090-00006. View

4.
Egger M, May M, Chene G, Phillips A, Ledergerber B, Dabis F . Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360(9327):119-29. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09411-4. View

5.
Mills E, Nachega J, Buchan I, Orbinski J, Attaran A, Singh S . Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa and North America: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006; 296(6):679-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.6.679. View