» Articles » PMID: 26417129

A Comparison of Intranasal Ketamine and Intranasal Midazolam for Pediatric Premedication

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2015 Sep 30
PMID 26417129
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims And Objectives: The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy and side-effects of Ketamine and Midazolam administered nasally for the pediatric premedication.

Materials And Methods: We studied 100 American Society of Anesthesiology I and II children aged from 1 to 10 years undergoing various surgical procedures. Totally, 50 children were evaluated for nasal ketamine (using 50 mg/ml vials) at the dose of 5 mg/kg and the other 50 received nasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg, before induction in operation theater each patient was observed for onset of sedation, degree of sedation, emotional status being recorded with a five point sedation scale, response to venipuncture and acceptance of mask, whether readily, with persuasion or refuse.

Results: The two groups were homogenous. Midazolam showed a statistically significant early onset of sedation (10.76 ± 2.0352 vs. 16.42 ± 2.0696 min). There were no significant differences in venipuncture score, sedation scale at 20 min, acceptance of mask and oxygen saturation throughout the study. Significant tachycardia and 'secretions were observed in the ketamine group intra operatively. Postoperatively emergence (8% vs. 0%) and secretions (28% vs. 4%) were significant in the ketamine group. Nausea and vomiting occurred in l6% versus 10% for midazolam and ketamine group.

Conclusions: Both midazolam and ketamine nasally are an effective pediatric premedication. Midazolam has an early onset of sedation and is associated with fewer side-effects.

Citing Articles

Intranasal midazolam for procedural distress in children in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang J, Speechley K, Anderson K, Gainham G, Ali S, Trottier E CJEM. 2024; 26(9):658-670.

PMID: 39198327 DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00731-2.


Comparing the Sedative Effects of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam, and Ketamine in Outpatient Pediatric Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Azemati S, Keihani M, Sahmeddini M, Kanaani Nejad F, Dehghanpisheh L, Khosravi M Iran J Med Sci. 2024; 49(7):421-429.

PMID: 39114639 PMC: 11300945. DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2023.99122.3118.


Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam as intranasal premedication for intravenous deep sedation in pediatric dental treatment.

Cheng T, Liu Y, Li B, Wu X, Xia B, Yang X J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(1):285-291.

PMID: 38303854 PMC: 10829544. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.04.009.


Efficacy of intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam for sedation in infant with cleft lip and palate undergoing CT scan: a randomized controlled trial.

Wang X, Ma L, Yang X, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Han F BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):10.

PMID: 38166622 PMC: 10759416. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02397-2.


Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lang B, Wang H, Fu Y, Zeng L, Huang L, Zhang Q BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22(1):399.

PMID: 36550437 PMC: 9773574. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01892-2.


References
1.
CHODOFF P . Evidence for central adrenergic action of ketamine: Report of a case. Anesth Analg. 1972; 51(2):247-50. View

2.
Weber F, Wulf H, el Saeidi G . Premedication with nasal s-ketamine and midazolam provides good conditions for induction of anesthesia in preschool children. Can J Anaesth. 2003; 50(5):470-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF03021058. View

3.
Louon A, Reddy V . Nasal midazolam and ketamine for paediatric sedation during computerised tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994; 38(3):259-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb03885.x. View

4.
Wilton N, Leigh J, Rosen D, Pandit U . Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children using intranasal midazolam. Anesthesiology. 1988; 69(6):972-5. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198812000-00032. View

5.
De Boer A, de Leede L, Breimer D . Drug absorption by sublingual and rectal routes. Br J Anaesth. 1984; 56(1):69-82. DOI: 10.1093/bja/56.1.69. View