» Articles » PMID: 26416400

Reverse Sural Flap with an Adipofascial Extension for Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects with Dead Spaces in the Heel and Ankle

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 30
PMID 26416400
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The reconstruction of soft tissue defects with dead spaces in the heel and ankle is challenging. This article describes our experience in the reconstruction of such defects using the reverse sural flap with an adipofascial extension.

Method: Reverse sural flaps with an adipofascial extension were used in 26 patients with soft tissue defects in the heel (n = 24) or ankle (n = 2). Extended adipofascial tissue was utilized to fill the dead space. The sizes of the adipofascial extensions varied from 2.0 to 5.0 cm in length and 4.0 to 12.5 cm in width.

Result: Twenty-three flaps survived completely, and lateral marginal necrosis occurred in three flaps. All the recipient-site wounds healed without any signs of infection. The reconstruction outcomes were excellent in 20 patients and good in 6 patients according to the criteria of Boyden et al.

Conclusion: The extended adipofascial tissue of the reverse sural flap improves closure of the dead spaces in soft tissue defects of the heel and ankle and thus provides beneficial conditions for the treatment of infection and reconstruction of both the function and contour of the soft tissue defects with dead spaces in the heel and ankle.

Citing Articles

Distally based sural flaps for soft tissue defects following traumatic osteomyelitis of lower leg and foot.

Luo S, Jiang Y, Dong Z, Peng X, Shi S, Luo Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23214.

PMID: 39369071 PMC: 11455833. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73492-8.


Fournier's gangrene: a review of predictive scoring systems and practical guide for patient management.

Bowen D, Hughes T, Juliebo-Jones P, Somani B Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024; 11:20499361241238521.

PMID: 38510990 PMC: 10952983. DOI: 10.1177/20499361241238521.


How Safe Is Reverse Sural Flap?: A Systematic Review.

Tripathee S, Basnet S, Lamichhane A, Hariani L Eplasty. 2022; 22:e18.

PMID: 35873071 PMC: 9275416.


Reconstruction of Complex Soft Tissue Defects of the Heel With Versatile Double Skin Paddle Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flaps: An Innovative Way to Restore Heel Shape.

He J, Guliyeva G, Wu P, Yu F, Qing L, Tang J Front Surg. 2022; 9:836505.

PMID: 35237651 PMC: 8884269. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.836505.


Clinical Challenges in Resection and Reconstruction of a Verrucous Carcinoma of the Right Calcaneus With a Medial Plantar Artery Perforator Flap: A Case Report.

De Jongh F, Pouwels S, Marinelli A, Willems W Cureus. 2021; 13(2):e13118.

PMID: 33728136 PMC: 7936390. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13118.


References
1.
Tajsic N, Winkel R, Hoffmann R, Husum H . Sural perforator flap for reconstructive surgery in the lower leg and the foot: a clinical study of 86 patients with post-traumatic osteomyelitis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 62(12):1701-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.091. View

2.
Herlin C, Lievain L, Qassemyar Q, Michel G, Assaf N, Sinna R . [Freestyle free perforator flaps for heel reconstruction]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2012; 58(4):283-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2012.08.005. View

3.
Chai Y, Zeng B, Zhang F, Kang Q, Yang Q . Experience with the distally based sural neurofasciocutaneous flap supplied by the terminal perforator of peroneal vessels for ankle and foot reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59(5):526-31. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000258969.13723.68. View

4.
Chang S, Zhang F, Xu D, Yu G, Hou C, Lineaweaver W . Lateral retromalleolar perforator-based flap: anatomical study and preliminary clinical report for heel coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120(3):697-704. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000270311.00922.73. View

5.
Parrett B, Pribaz J, Matros E, Przylecki W, Sampson C, Orgill D . Risk analysis for the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap in distal leg reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123(5):1499-1504. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a07723. View