» Articles » PMID: 26416234

Meaning in Life and Perceived Quality of Life in Switzerland: Results of a Representative Survey in the German, French and Italian Regions

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Sep 30
PMID 26416234
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The concept of meaning in life (MIL) has become a central one in recent years, particularly in psycho-oncology and palliative care. The Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMILE) has been developed to allow individuals to choose the life areas that they consider to be important for their own MIL. This approach relates to the "World Health Organisation" definition of quality of life (QOL) as an individual's perception of his own position. The aims of this study were (i) to assess MIL in a representative sample of the Swiss population according to the three linguistic regions and (ii) to evaluate whether MIL constitutes a significant determinant of the perceived QOL.

Methods: A telephone survey of the Swiss population, performed by a professional survey company, was conducted between November and December 2013. The interview included the SMILE, perceived QOL (0-10) and health status (1-5), and various sociodemographic variables. In the SMILE, an index of weighting (IOW, 20-100), an index of satisfaction (IOS, 0-100), and a total SMILE index (IOWS, 0-100) are calculated from the areas mentioned by the participants as providing MIL.

Results: Among the 6671 telephonic contacts realized, 1015 (15%) participants completed the survey: 405 French, 400 German and 210 Italian participants. "Family" (80.2%), "occupation/work" (51%), and "social relations" (43.3%) were the most cited MIL-relevant categories. Italian participants listed "health" more frequently than German and French participants (50.4% vs 31.5% and 24.8% respectively, χ(2) = 12.229, p = .002). Age, gender, education, employment, and marital status significantly influenced either the MIL scores or the MIL-relevant categories. Linear regression analyses indicate that 24.3% of the QOL variance (p = .000) is explained by health status (B = .609, IC = .490-.728, p = .000), MIL (B = .034, IC = .028-.041, p = .000) and socioeconomic status (F = 11.01, p = .000).

Conclusion: The major finding of our analysis highlights the positive and significant influence of MIL on the perceived QOL in a representative sample of a general, multilingual and multicultural population. This result indicates that the existential dimension is not only determinant for QOL in some critical life events, as shown e.g. in psycho-oncology and palliative care, but also in everyday life.

Citing Articles

The effect of the work-family conflict, subjective socio-economic status, and physical activity on the perceived quality of life of working women in Iran: the mediating role of quality of work life.

Rajabi-Gilan N, Zardoshtian S, Sarabi N, Khezeli M BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):45.

PMID: 39893490 PMC: 11786459. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03578-6.


The role of meaning in life in the association between loneliness and depression: a mediation study among older adults from 26 European countries.

de Maio Nascimento M, Marques A, Gouveia E, Green G, Lampraki C, Ihle A Psychiatr Q. 2024; 95(4):599-617.

PMID: 39285004 DOI: 10.1007/s11126-024-10091-w.


Predicting perceived quality of life through social trust, physical activity, and sense of happiness in Iran: Moderating role of gender.

Gilan R, Mohamadi J, Zardoshtian S, Sarabi N, Palangard N, Khezeli M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(5):e2121.

PMID: 38774591 PMC: 11106513. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2121.


Predictors of Quality of Life in HIV-Infected Persons from Mozambique: The Dual Role of Schooling.

Lufiande J, Silva S, Reis A, Guerra M Infect Dis Rep. 2023; 15(4):392-402.

PMID: 37489394 PMC: 10366898. DOI: 10.3390/idr15040040.


Occupational Happiness of Civilian Nurses in China: a cross-sectional study.

Meng Y, Luo X, Sun P, Luo Y, Wang Z, Wang L BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):233.

PMID: 37403055 PMC: 10318687. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01397-4.


References
1.
Joyce C, Hickey A, McGee H, OBoyle C . A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL. Qual Life Res. 2003; 12(3):275-80. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023273117040. View

2.
Rodin G, Lo C, Mikulincer M, Donner A, Gagliese L, Zimmermann C . Pathways to distress: the multiple determinants of depression, hopelessness, and the desire for hastened death in metastatic cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 68(3):562-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.037. View

3.
Fegg M, Kramer M, Bausewein C, Borasio G . Meaning in life in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of a representative survey with the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMiLE). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5:59. PMC: 2206010. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-59. View

4.
Kudla D, Kujur J, Tigga S, Tirkey P, Rai P, Fegg M . Meaning in life experience at the end of life: validation of the Hindi version of the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation and a cross-cultural comparison between Indian and German palliative care patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014; 49(1):79-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.013. View

5.
Cruz L, Polanczyk C, Camey S, Hoffmann J, Fleck M . Quality of life in Brazil: normative values for the WHOQOL-bref in a southern general population sample. Qual Life Res. 2011; 20(7):1123-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9845-3. View