» Articles » PMID: 26412905

TEEN DATING VIOLENCE: THE INFLUENCE OF FRIENDSHIPS AND SCHOOL CONTEXT

Overview
Journal Sociol Focus
Date 2015 Sep 29
PMID 26412905
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior research has examined parental and peer influences on teen dating violence (TDV), but fewer studies have explored the role of broader social contexts. Using data from the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS), the present research examines the effect of variations in school context on teen dating violence perpetration, while taking into account parental, peer, and demographic factors. Drawing on interview data from 955 adolescents across 32 different schools, results indicate that net of parents' and friends' use of violence, the normative climate of schools, specifically school-level teen dating violence, is a significant predictor of respondents' own violence perpetration. School-level dating norms (non-exclusivity in relationships) also contribute indirectly to the odds of experiencing TDV. However, a more general measure of school-level violence toward friends is not strongly related to variations in TDV, suggesting the need to focus on domain-specific influences. Implications for theories emphasizing social learning processes and for TDV prevention efforts are discussed.

Citing Articles

Societal Factors and Teen Dating Violence: a Scoping Review.

Adhia A, Richey A, McMahon S, Temple J, Rothman E Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2024; 11(2):96-109.

PMID: 39045453 PMC: 11262579. DOI: 10.1007/s40471-023-00330-2.


Teen dating violence and the COVID-19 pandemic: trends from a longitudinal study in Texas.

Wood L, Baumler E, PettyJohn M, Temple J Inj Prev. 2024; 30(6):481-487.

PMID: 38443162 PMC: 11374931. DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-045115.


Who beats their partner, and who beats their schoolmates? A comparison of teen dating and school physical violence perpetration in Lower Saxony, Germany.

Baier D, Krieg Y, Hong J, Kliem S New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2021; 2021(178):79-93.

PMID: 34724593 PMC: 9297934. DOI: 10.1002/cad.20439.


Relationship Dynamics Associated with Dating Violence among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Feminist Post-Structural Analysis.

Giordano P, Copp J, Manning W, Longmore M Fem Criminol. 2021; 16(3):320-336.

PMID: 34658680 PMC: 8519583. DOI: 10.1177/1557085120987613.


A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women.

Pichon M, Treves-Kagan S, Stern E, Kyegombe N, Stockl H, Buller A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16).

PMID: 32781565 PMC: 7459695. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165682.


References
1.
Moynihan M, Banyard V, Cares A, Potter S, Williams L, Stapleton J . Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later?. J Interpers Violence. 2014; 30(1):110-32. DOI: 10.1177/0886260514532719. View

2.
Cui M, Ueno K, Gordon M, Fincham F . The Continuation of Intimate Partner Violence from Adolescence to Young Adulthood. J Marriage Fam. 2013; 75(2):300-313. PMC: 3653598. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12016. View

3.
Reed E, Silverman J, Welles S, Santana M, Missmer S, Raj A . Associations between perceptions and involvement in neighborhood violence and intimate partner violence perpetration among urban, African American men. J Community Health. 2009; 34(4):328-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-009-9161-9. View

4.
Williams L, Hickle K . "He cheated on me, I cheated on him back": Mexican American and White adolescents' perceptions of cheating in romantic relationships. J Adolesc. 2010; 34(5):1005-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.11.007. View

5.
Renner L, Whitney S . Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse Negl. 2012; 36(1):40-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007. View