» Articles » PMID: 26412811

Parallel Processing of General and Specific Threat During Early Stages of Perception

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 29
PMID 26412811
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Differential processing of threat can consummate as early as 100 ms post-stimulus. Moreover, early perception not only differentiates threat from non-threat stimuli but also distinguishes among discrete threat subtypes (e.g. fear, disgust and anger). Combining spatial-frequency-filtered images of fear, disgust and neutral scenes with high-density event-related potentials and intracranial source estimation, we investigated the neural underpinnings of general and specific threat processing in early stages of perception. Conveyed in low spatial frequencies, fear and disgust images evoked convergent visual responses with similarly enhanced N1 potentials and dorsal visual (middle temporal gyrus) cortical activity (relative to neutral cues; peaking at 156 ms). Nevertheless, conveyed in high spatial frequencies, fear and disgust elicited divergent visual responses, with fear enhancing and disgust suppressing P1 potentials and ventral visual (occipital fusiform) cortical activity (peaking at 121 ms). Therefore, general and specific threat processing operates in parallel in early perception, with the ventral visual pathway engaged in specific processing of discrete threats and the dorsal visual pathway in general threat processing. Furthermore, selectively tuned to distinctive spatial-frequency channels and visual pathways, these parallel processes underpin dimensional and categorical threat characterization, promoting efficient threat response. These findings thus lend support to hybrid models of emotion.

Citing Articles

Recognition of Emotional and Neutral Visual Scenes in Carriers of the MAOA, COMT, DRD4, and 5HT2A Gene Polymorphisms.

Ermakov P, Vorobyeva E, Denisova E, Yavna D, Babenko V, Kovsh E Psychol Russ. 2023; 15(4):159-169.

PMID: 36761718 PMC: 9903230. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2022.0410.


Sensing fear: fast and precise threat evaluation in human sensory cortex.

Li W, Keil A Trends Cogn Sci. 2023; 27(4):341-352.

PMID: 36732175 PMC: 10023404. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.01.001.


High spatial frequencies disrupt conscious visual recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.

Mermillod M, Perrier M, Lacroix A, Kauffmann L, Peyrin C, Meot A Heliyon. 2022; 8(12):e11964.

PMID: 36561662 PMC: 9763755. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11964.


A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG.

Donos C, Blidarescu B, Pistol C, Oane I, Mindruta I, Barborica A Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:946240.

PMID: 36225734 PMC: 9549146. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.946240.


Pattern differentiation and tuning shift in human sensory cortex underlie long-term threat memory.

You Y, Novak L, Clancy K, Li W Curr Biol. 2022; 32(9):2067-2075.e4.

PMID: 35325599 PMC: 9090975. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.076.


References
1.
Vogel E, Luck S . The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(2):190-203. View

2.
Schupp H, Cuthbert B, Bradley M, Cacioppo J, Ito T, Lang P . Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(2):257-61. View

3.
Keil A, Muller M, Gruber T, Wienbruch C, Stolarova M, Elbert T . Effects of emotional arousal in the cerebral hemispheres: a study of oscillatory brain activity and event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(11):2057-68. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00654-x. View

4.
Ullman S, Vidal-Naquet M, Sali E . Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(7):682-7. DOI: 10.1038/nn870. View

5.
Keil A, Bradley M, Hauk O, Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Lang P . Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. Psychophysiology. 2002; 39(5):641-9. DOI: 10.1017.S0048577202394162. View