» Articles » PMID: 26409607

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Antiviral Strategies for the Treatment of HBeAg-Positive and HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B in the United Kingdom

Overview
Journal Value Health
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Sep 28
PMID 26409607
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Seven drugs are licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the United Kingdom. Which initial treatment, secondary therapy, and whether antivirals should be given alone or in combination are questions of considerable uncertainty.

Objective: The aim of this model was to undertake a comprehensive economic evaluation of all antiviral treatments for CHB to recommend the most cost-effective therapeutic sequence.

Methods: We developed a probabilistic Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of all clinically relevant antiviral treatment sequences for nucleos(t)ide-naive adults with hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive or HBeAg-negative CHB. Relative rates of HBeAg seroconversion and viral suppression were obtained from a network meta-analysis. Data on mortality, antiviral drug resistance, durability of response, adverse events, and costs were obtained from published literature. Results are reported in terms of lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and expected net benefit.

Results: In the base-case analysis, pegylated interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN α-2a) followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was most effective and cost-effective in HBeAg-positive patients, with a cost of £7488 per QALY gained compared with no treatment. In HBeAg-negative patients, peg-IFN α-2a followed by entecavir was most effective and cost-effective, with a cost of £6981 per QALY gained. The model was robust to a wide range of sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Peg-IFN α-2a followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir is the most effective antiviral treatment strategy for people with both variants of CHB. At a cost of less than £10,000 per QALY gained, these sequences are considered cost-effective in England and Wales. The results of this analysis were used to inform 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline recommendations.

Citing Articles

Cost-Utility Analysis of Tenofovir Alafenamide and Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Markov Decision Model.

Lai C, Shi H, Tsai C, Yang Y, Chiu S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398204 PMC: 10887268. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040813.


Understanding the Natural History of Chronic Hepatitis D: Proposal of a Model for Cost-Effectiveness Studies.

Kaushik A, Dusheiko G, Kim C, Smith N, Kinyik-Merena C, Di Tanna G Pharmacoecon Open. 2024; 8(2):333-343.

PMID: 38172472 PMC: 10884366. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00466-3.


A real-world retrospective single-centre study of the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of pegylated interferon for chronic hepatitis B.

Congly S, Syed A, Haylock-Jacobs S, Israelson H, Pinto J, Williams S Can Liver J. 2023; 6(3):305-313.

PMID: 38020196 PMC: 10652987. DOI: 10.3138/canlivj-2022-0043.


Cost-Effectiveness of Tenofovir Alafenamide for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Canada.

Tian F, Houle S, Alsabbagh M, Wong W Pharmacoeconomics. 2019; 38(2):181-192.

PMID: 31691902 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00852-y.


Are Published Health Economic Models for Chronic Hepatitis B Appropriately Capturing the Benefits of HBsAg Loss? A Systematic Literature Review.

Wigfield P, Sbarigia U, Hashim M, Vincken T, Heeg B Pharmacoecon Open. 2019; 4(3):403-418.

PMID: 31428938 PMC: 7426349. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-00175-w.