» Articles » PMID: 26408037

Confidence Leak in Perceptual Decision Making

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2015 Sep 27
PMID 26408037
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People live in a continuous environment in which the visual scene changes on a slow timescale. It has been shown that to exploit such environmental stability, the brain creates a continuity field in which objects seen seconds ago influence the perception of current objects. What is unknown is whether a similar mechanism exists at the level of metacognitive representations. In three experiments, we demonstrated a robust intertask confidence leak-that is, confidence in one's response on a given task or trial influencing confidence on the following task or trial. This confidence leak could not be explained by response priming or attentional fluctuations. Better ability to modulate confidence leak predicted higher capacity for metacognition as well as greater gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex. A model based on normative principles from Bayesian inference explained the results by postulating that observers subjectively estimate the perceptual signal strength in a stable environment. These results point to the existence of a novel metacognitive mechanism mediated by regions in the prefrontal cortex.

Citing Articles

A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition.

Rahnev D Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):701.

PMID: 39814749 PMC: 11735976. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56117-0.


No gender difference in confidence or metacognitive ability in perceptual decision-making.

Xue K, Zheng Y, Papalexandrou C, Hoogervorst K, Allen M, Rahnev D iScience. 2024; 27(12):111375.

PMID: 39660052 PMC: 11629282. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111375.


Challenging the Bayesian confidence hypothesis in perceptual decision-making.

Xue K, Shekhar M, Rahnev D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(48):e2410487121.

PMID: 39576348 PMC: 11621837. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410487121.


Human-like dissociations between confidence and accuracy in convolutional neural networks.

Shekhar M, Rahnev D PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(11):e1012578.

PMID: 39541396 PMC: 11594416. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012578.


Structural disorder facilitates future memory decisions.

Bocheva M Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2034):20242154.

PMID: 39532138 PMC: 11557226. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2154.


References
1.
James K, James T, Jobard G, Wong A, Gauthier I . Letter processing in the visual system: different activation patterns for single letters and strings. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006; 5(4):452-66. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.5.4.452. View

2.
Ma W, Beck J, Latham P, Pouget A . Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(11):1432-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1790. View

3.
Koriat A . Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011; 140(1):117-39. DOI: 10.1037/a0022171. View

4.
Nikolic D, Muresan R, Feng W, Singer W . Scaled correlation analysis: a better way to compute a cross-correlogram. Eur J Neurosci. 2012; 35(5):742-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07987.x. View

5.
Frund I, Wichmann F, Macke J . Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions. J Vis. 2014; 14(7). DOI: 10.1167/14.7.9. View