» Articles » PMID: 26403465

Variable Piperaquine Exposure Significantly Impacts Protective Efficacy of Monthly Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the Prevention of Malaria in Ugandan Children

Overview
Journal Malar J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2015 Sep 26
PMID 26403465
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anti-malarial chemoprevention with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA/PQ) is a promising tool for malaria control, but its efficacy in children may be limited by inadequate drug exposure.

Methods: Children were enrolled in a non directly-observed trial of DHA/PQ chemoprevention in a high transmission setting in Uganda. Children were randomized at 6 months of age to no chemoprevention (n = 89) or monthly DHA/PQ (n = 87) and followed through 24 months of age, with pharmacokinetic sampling performed at variable times following monthly dosing of DHA/PQ. A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate piperaquine (PQ) exposure in each child, and associations between PQ exposure and the protective efficacy (PE) of DHA/PQ were explored.

Results: The incidence of malaria was 6.83 and 3.09 episodes per person year at risk in the no chemoprevention and DHA/PQ arms, respectively (PE 54 %, 95 % CI 39-66 %, P < 0.001). Among children randomized to DHA/PQ, 493 pharmacokinetic samples were collected. Despite nearly 100 % reported adherence to study drug administration at home, there was wide variability in PQ exposure, and children were stratified into three groups based on average PQ exposure during the intervention that was determined by model generated percentiles (low, n = 40; medium, n = 37, and high, n = 10). Gender and socioeconomic factors were not significantly associated with PQ exposure. In multivariate models, the PE of DHA/PQ was 31 % in the low PQ exposure group (95 % CI 6-49 %, P = 0.02), 67 % in the medium PQ exposure group (95 % CI 54-76 %, P < 0.001), and 97 % in the high PQ exposure group (95 % CI 89-99 %, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The protective efficacy of DHA/PQ chemoprevention in young children was strongly associated with higher drug exposure; in children with the highest PQ exposure, monthly DHA/PQ chemoprevention was nearly 100 % protective against malaria. Strategies to ensure good adherence to monthly dosing and optimize drug exposure are critical to maximize the efficacy of this promising malaria control strategy.

Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials Identifier NCT00948896.

Citing Articles

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine effectiveness for seasonal malaria chemoprevention in settings with extended seasonal malaria transmission in Tanzania.

Mwaiswelo R, Ngasala B, Chaky F, Molteni F, Mohamed A, Lazaro S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2143.

PMID: 38273019 PMC: 10810795. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52706-z.


Impact of population based indoor residual spraying in combination with mass drug administration on malaria incidence and test positivity in a high transmission setting in north eastern Uganda.

Ronald M, Humphrey W, Adoke Y, Jean-Pierre V Malar J. 2023; 22(1):378.

PMID: 38093286 PMC: 10717204. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04799-6.


Interplay among malnutrition, chemoprevention, and the risk of malaria in young Ugandan children: Longitudinal pharmacodynamic and growth analysis.

Ali A, Wallender E, Hughes E, Dorsey G, Savic R CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023; 12(5):656-667.

PMID: 36919202 PMC: 10196432. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12892.


Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants.

Esu E, Oringanje C, Meremikwu M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 7:CD011525.

PMID: 34273901 PMC: 8406727. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011525.pub3.


Impact of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on the incidence of malaria in infancy: a randomized controlled trial.

Kakuru A, Jagannathan P, Kajubi R, Ochieng T, Ochokoru H, Nakalembe M BMC Med. 2020; 18(1):207.

PMID: 32772921 PMC: 7416391. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01675-x.


References
1.
Greenwood B, Bojang K, Whitty C, Targett G . Malaria. Lancet. 2005; 365(9469):1487-98. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66420-3. View

2.
Kuile F, van Eijk A, Filler S . Effect of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance on the efficacy of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria control during pregnancy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007; 297(23):2603-16. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.23.2603. View

3.
Nosten F, White N . Artemisinin-based combination treatment of falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 77(6 Suppl):181-92. View

4.
Tarning J, Ashley E, Lindegardh N, Stepniewska K, Phaiphun L, Day N . Population pharmacokinetics of piperaquine after two different treatment regimens with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52(3):1052-61. PMC: 2258541. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00955-07. View

5.
Enayati A, Hemingway J . Malaria management: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009; 55:569-91. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085423. View