Discrepancy Between Vitamin D Total Immunoassays Due to Various Cross-reactivities
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The purpose of this study was to find out the cause of discrepancy between various automated immunoassays for 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-[OH]D).
Methods: National Institute of Standards & Technology Standard Reference Material (SRM) 972a is SRM for 25-(OH)D and consists of 4 vials of frozen serum with different concentrations of 25-(OH)D. Each concentration was measured 6 times in 3 different immunoassays: ADVIA Vitamin D Total assay (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), ARCHITECT 25-(OH)D (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA), and COBAS Vitamin D Total assay (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).
Results: When using the certified reference values of SRM 972a as it is, discarding the cross-reactivity of each immunoassay, for ADVIA, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) as a score of regression analysis was 0.8995 and maximal difference between measured value and certified reference value was 3.6 ng/mL in level 3. The R(2) and maximal differences of ARCHITECT were 0.5377 and 6.9 ng/mL, respectively, in level 4. Those of COBAS were 0.3674 and 22.3 ng/mL, respectively, in level 4. When considering cross-reactivities of each immunoassays to various 25-(OH)D metabolites, the ADVIA had R(2) and maximal difference of 0.9254 and 3.3 ng/mL, respectively, in level 3. For ARCHITECT, the R(2) and maximal differences were 0.7602 and 5.1 ng/mL, respectively, in level 1. Those of COBAS were 0.9284 and 4.9 ng/mL, respectively, in level 1.
Conclusions: The cause of discrepancies between vitamin D immunoassays was mainly on the difference in cross-reactivities to various vitamin D metabolites. The discrepancies can be considerably decreased by considering cross-reactivities of each immunoassay.
An AuNPs-based electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of 25-hydroxy vitamin D.
Cai T, Chen M, Yang J, Tang C, Lu X, Wei Z Anal Sci. 2024; 40(4):599-607.
PMID: 38190076 DOI: 10.1007/s44211-023-00489-0.
Kimsa-Furdzik M, Bednarek A, Hibner G, Czajka-Francuz P, Cison-Jurek S, Karawasiecka D Metabolites. 2023; 13(9).
PMID: 37755276 PMC: 10534610. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13090996.
Stephenson A, Hunter B, Shaw P, Abu Kassim N, Trengove R, Takechi R Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023; 415(7):1357-1369.
PMID: 36705732 PMC: 9928823. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04527-8.
Alharthi S, Attia M, Abou-Omar M RSC Adv. 2022; 11(34):20865-20873.
PMID: 35479388 PMC: 9034052. DOI: 10.1039/d1ra02396a.
Graphene oxide and fluorescent aptamer based novel biosensor for detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Gupta R, Kaul S, Singh V, Kumar S, Singhal N Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23456.
PMID: 34873222 PMC: 8649066. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02837-4.