» Articles » PMID: 26385598

Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: Experiences From the Field and Future Opportunities

Abstract

Background: With the aim of improving health care processes through health information technology (HIT), the US government has promulgated requirements for "meaningful use" (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) as a condition for providers receiving financial incentives for the adoption and use of these systems. Considerable uncertainty remains about the impact of these requirements on the effective application of EHR systems.

Objective: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-sponsored Centers for Education and Research in Therapeutics (CERTs) critically examined the impact of the MU policy relating to the use of medications and jointly developed recommendations to help inform future HIT policy.

Methods: We gathered perspectives from a wide range of stakeholders (N=35) who had experience with MU requirements, including academicians, practitioners, and policy makers from different health care organizations including and beyond the CERTs. Specific issues and recommendations were discussed and agreed on as a group.

Results: Stakeholders' knowledge and experiences from implementing MU requirements fell into 6 domains: (1) accuracy of medication lists and medication reconciliation, (2) problem list accuracy and the shift in HIT priorities, (3) accuracy of allergy lists and allergy-related standards development, (4) support of safer and effective prescribing for children, (5) considerations for rural communities, and (6) general issues with achieving MU. Standards are needed to better facilitate the exchange of data elements between health care settings. Several organizations felt that their preoccupation with fulfilling MU requirements stifled innovation. Greater emphasis should be placed on local HIT configurations that better address population health care needs.

Conclusions: Although MU has stimulated adoption of EHRs, its effects on quality and safety remain uncertain. Stakeholders felt that MU requirements should be more flexible and recognize that integrated models may achieve information-sharing goals in alternate ways. Future certification rules and requirements should enhance EHR functionalities critical for safer prescribing of medications in children.

Citing Articles

End-users' perspectives on factors affecting implementation and utilization of the Iranian electronic health record system: a qualitative study in a developing country.

Abbasi H, Rahimi B, Jebraeily M, Nourani A BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1064.

PMID: 37798629 PMC: 10557278. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10033-5.


Generate Analysis-Ready Data for Real-world Evidence: Tutorial for Harnessing Electronic Health Records With Advanced Informatic Technologies.

Hou J, Zhao R, Gronsbell J, Lin Y, Bonzel C, Zeng Q J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45662.

PMID: 37227772 PMC: 10251230. DOI: 10.2196/45662.


Persuasive Technologies and Social Interactions in Professional Environments: Embedded Qualitative Case Study.

Marcolin B, Saunders C, Aubert B JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(2):e32613.

PMID: 35195527 PMC: 8908198. DOI: 10.2196/32613.


Association Between Removal of a Warning Against Cephalosporin Use in Patients With Penicillin Allergy and Antibiotic Prescribing.

Macy E, McCormick T, Adams J, Crawford W, Nguyen M, Hoang L JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(4):e218367.

PMID: 33914051 PMC: 8085727. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8367.


Drug Alert Experience and Salience during Medical Residency at Two Healthcare Institutions.

Gadhiya K, Zamora E, Saiyed S, Friedlander D, Kaelber D Appl Clin Inform. 2021; 12(2):355-361.

PMID: 33910260 PMC: 8081588. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729167.


References
1.
Schnipper J, Liang C, Hamann C, Karson A, Palchuk M, McCarthy P . Development of a tool within the electronic medical record to facilitate medication reconciliation after hospital discharge. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(3):309-13. PMC: 3078655. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000040. View

2.
Scharnweber C, Lau B, Mollenkopf N, Thiemann D, Veltri M, Lehmann C . Evaluation of medication dose alerts in pediatric inpatients. Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82(8):676-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.04.002. View

3.
Kirkendall E, Spooner S, Logan J . Evaluating the accuracy of electronic pediatric drug dosing rules. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 21(e1):e43-9. PMC: 3957390. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001793. View

4.
Condren M, Studebaker I, John B . Prescribing errors in a pediatric clinic. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009; 49(1):49-53. DOI: 10.1177/0009922809342459. View

5.
Schnipper J, Hamann C, Ndumele C, Liang C, Carty M, Karson A . Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application and process redesign on potential adverse drug events: a cluster-randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(8):771-80. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.51. View