Article: How Does Word Length Evolve in Written Chinese?

We demonstrate a substantial evidence that the word length can be an essential lexical structural feature for word evolution in written Chinese. The data used in this study are diachronic Chinese short narrative texts with a time span of over 2000-years. We show that the increase of word length is an essential regularity in word evolution. On the one hand, word frequency is found to depend on word length, and their relation is in line with the Power law function y = ax-b. On the other hand, our deeper analyses show that the increase of word length results in the simplification in characters for balance in written Chinese. Moreover, the correspondence between written and spoken Chinese is discussed. We conclude that the disyllabic trend may account for the increase of word length, and its impacts can be explained in "the principle of least effort".

Citing Articles

Social changes through the lens of language: A big data study of Chinese modal verbs.

Wang S, Liu R, Huang C PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0260210.

PMID: 34982791 PMC: 8726480. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260210.

How does language change as a lexical network? An investigation based on written Chinese word co-occurrence networks.

Chen H, Chen X, Liu H PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192545.

PMID: 29489837 PMC: 5830315. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192545.

Uncovering the differences in linguistic network dynamics of book and social media texts.

Turker I, Sehirli E, Demiral E Springerplus. 2016; 5(1):864.

PMID: 27386313 PMC: 4920735. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2598-2.

References

1.

Nowak M, Krakauer D . The evolution of language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(14):8028-33. PMC: 22182. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8028. View

2.

Petersen A, Tenenbaum J, Havlin S, Stanley H . Statistical laws governing fluctuations in word use from word birth to word death. Sci Rep. 2012; 2:313. PMC: 3304511. DOI: 10.1038/srep00313. View

3.

Piantadosi S, Tily H, Gibson E . Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(9):3526-9. PMC: 3048148. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012551108. View

4.

Gong T, Shuai L, Zhang M . Modelling language evolution: Examples and predictions. Phys Life Rev. 2013; 11(2):280-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.009. View

5.

Baixeries J, Elvevag B, Ferrer-I-Cancho R . The evolution of the exponent of Zipf's law in language ontogeny. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e53227. PMC: 3596411. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053227. View

6.

Plotkin J, Nowak M . Language evolution and information theory. J Theor Biol. 2000; 205(1):147-59. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2053. View

7.

Pinker S, Jackendoff R . The faculty of language: what's special about it?. Cognition. 2005; 95(2):201-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004. View

8.

Pagel M, Atkinson Q, Meade A . Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature. 2007; 449(7163):717-20. DOI: 10.1038/nature06176. View

9.

Bochkarev V, Solovyev V, Wichmann S . Universals versus historical contingencies in lexical evolution. J R Soc Interface. 2014; 11(101):20140841. PMC: 4223904. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0841. View

10.

Lieberman E, Michel J, Jackson J, Tang T, Nowak M . Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature. 2007; 449(7163):713-6. PMC: 2460562. DOI: 10.1038/nature06137. View

11.

Nowak M, Krakauer D, Dress A . An error limit for the evolution of language. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 266(1433):2131-6. PMC: 1690318. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0898. View

12.

Nowak M, Plotkin J, Krakauer D . The evolutionary language game. J Theor Biol. 1999; 200(2):147-62. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0981. View