» Articles » PMID: 26379523

Do Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Rely on Two Distinct Neural Systems? A Case Study in Face Processing

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Sep 18
PMID 26379523
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arguably the most influential models of human decision-making today are based on the assumption that two separable systems - intuition and deliberation - underlie the judgments that people make. Our recent work is among the first to present neural evidence contrary to the predictions of these dual-systems accounts. We measured brain activations using functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants were specifically instructed to either intuitively or deliberately judge the authenticity of emotional facial expressions. Results from three different analyses revealed both common brain networks of activation across decision mode and differential activations as a function of strategy adherence. We take our results to contradict popular dual-systems accounts that propose a clear-cut dichotomy of the processing systems, and to support rather a unified model. According to this, intuitive and deliberate judgment processes rely on the same rules, though only the former are thought to be characterized by non-conscious processing.

Citing Articles

Neural Underpinnings of Financial Decision Bias in Older Adults: Putative Theoretical Models and a Way to Reconcile Them.

McCormick M, Reyna V, Ball K, Katz J, Deshpande G Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:184.

PMID: 30930732 PMC: 6427068. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00184.


A Similarity-Based Process for Human Judgment in the Parietal Cortex.

Wirebring L, Stillesjo S, Eriksson J, Juslin P, Nyberg L Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 12:481.

PMID: 30631267 PMC: 6315133. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00481.


Scrutinizing the Emotional Nature of Intuitive Coherence Judgments.

Zander T, Fernandez Cruz A, Winkelmann M, Volz K J Behav Decis Mak. 2017; 30(3):693-707.

PMID: 28701820 PMC: 5484385. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1982.


Intuitive Face Judgments Rely on Holistic Eye Movement Pattern.

Mega L, Volz K Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1005.

PMID: 28676773 PMC: 5476727. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01005.


Search and Coherence-Building in Intuition and Insight Problem Solving.

Ollinger M, von Muller A Front Psychol. 2017; 8:827.

PMID: 28611702 PMC: 5447020. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00827.


References
1.
Evans J . Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 59:255-78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629. View

2.
Birn R, Cox R, Bandettini P . Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: choosing the optimal stimulus timing. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):252-64. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0964. View

3.
Dijkstra K, van der Pligt J, Van Kleef G . Effects of processing style on responsiveness to affective stimuli and processing fluency. Cogn Emot. 2013; 28(6):959-70. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.865597. View

4.
Evans J, Stanovich K . Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 8(3):223-41. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612460685. View

5.
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):825-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8. View