» Articles » PMID: 26376674

Coproduction of Healthcare Service

Overview
Journal BMJ Qual Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2015 Sep 18
PMID 26376674
Citations 363
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Efforts to ensure effective participation of patients in healthcare are called by many names-patient centredness, patient engagement, patient experience. Improvement initiatives in this domain often resemble the efforts of manufacturers to engage consumers in designing and marketing products. Services, however, are fundamentally different than products; unlike goods, services are always 'coproduced'. Failure to recognise this unique character of a service and its implications may limit our success in partnering with patients to improve health care. We trace a partial history of the coproduction concept, present a model of healthcare service coproduction and explore its application as a design principle in three healthcare service delivery innovations. We use the principle to examine the roles, relationships and aims of this interdependent work. We explore the principle's implications and challenges for health professional development, for service delivery system design and for understanding and measuring benefit in healthcare services.

Citing Articles

Integrating patient and public involvement into co-design of healthcare improvement: a case study in maternity care.

Attal B, Leeding J, VAN DER Scheer J, Barry Z, Crookes E, Igwe S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):352.

PMID: 40055700 PMC: 11889828. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12423-3.


The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm.

Benjamin E, Peterson A, Schweitzer L, Calcasola S, Korn F, Lodato P Front Health Serv. 2025; 5:1513670.

PMID: 40017624 PMC: 11865032. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670.


Exploring a Co-Designed Approach for Healthcare Quality Improvement-Learning Through Developmental Evaluation.

Burns K, George M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942500 PMC: 11817868. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030311.


Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study.

Bugnon B, Bosisio F, Kaufmann A, Bonnabry P, Geissbuhler A, von Plessen C J Particip Med. 2025; 17:e50828.

PMID: 39874569 PMC: 11815291. DOI: 10.2196/50828.


Finding the Value: Identifying the Key Elements of Recorded Clinic Visits From the Perspective of Patients, Clinicians, and Caregivers.

Barr P, Wasp G, Dannenberg M, Mistler L, Verma K, Bonasia K Health Expect. 2025; 28(1):e70143.

PMID: 39776090 PMC: 11708869. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70143.


References
1.
Lindenauer P, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg M, Benjamin E, Ma A . Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(5):486-96. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa064964. View

2.
Holden R, Carayon P, Gurses A, Hoonakker P, Hundt A, Ozok A . SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics. 2013; 56(11):1669-86. PMC: 3835697. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. View

3.
Carman K, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C . Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):223-31. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133. View

4.
Wagner E, Austin B, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A . Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 20(6):64-78. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64. View

5.
Barry M, Edgman-Levitan S . Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(9):780-1. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283. View