Contrast-enhanced Dual Energy Mammography with a Novel Anode/filter Combination and Artifact Reduction: a Feasibility Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography (CEDEM) using titanium (Ti) filtering at 49 kVp for high-energy images and a novel artefact reducing image-subtraction post-processing algorithm.
Methods: Fifteen patients with suspicious findings (ACR BI-RADS 4 and 5) detected with digital mammography (MG) that required biopsy were included. CEDEM examinations were performed on a modified prototype machine. Acquired HE and low-energy raw data images were registered non-rigidly to compensate for possible subtle tissue motion. Subtracted CEDEM images were generated via weighted subtraction, using a fully automatic, locally adjusted tissue thickness-dependent subtraction factor to avoid over-subtraction at the breast border. Two observers evaluated the MG and CEDEM images according to ACR BI-RADS in two reading sessions. Results were correlated with histopathology.
Results: Seven patients with benign and eight with malignant findings were included. All malignant lesions showed a strong contrast enhancement. BI-RADS assessment was altered in 66.6 % through the addition of CEDEM, resulting in increased overall accuracy. With CEDEM, additional lesions were depicted and false-positive rate was reduced compared to MG.
Conclusions: CEDEM using Ti filtering with 49 kVp for HE exposures is feasible in a clinical setting. The proposed image-processing algorithm has the potential to reduce artefacts and improve CEDEM images.
Key Points: • CEDEM with a titanium filter is feasible in a clinical setting. • Breast thickness-dependent image subtraction has the potential to improve CEDEM images. • The proposed image-processing algorithm reduces artefacts.
Homolka P, Breyer L, Semturs F Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(10).
PMID: 39451811 PMC: 11504517. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9100606.
[Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Fischer U, Diekmann F, Helbich T, Preibsch H, Pusken M, Wenkel E Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023; 63(12):916-924.
PMID: 37889284 PMC: 10692004. DOI: 10.1007/s00117-023-01222-8.
Wessling D, Mannlin S, Schwarz R, Hagen F, Brendlin A, Olthof S Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(4):2945-2953.
PMID: 36474057 PMC: 10017655. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09238-9.
Artifact reduction in contrast-enhanced mammography.
Gennaro G, Baldan E, Bezzon E, Caumo F Insights Imaging. 2022; 13(1):90.
PMID: 35554734 PMC: 9098782. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01211-w.
Sun Y, Wang S, Liu Z, You C, Li R, Mao N Cancer Imaging. 2022; 22(1):22.
PMID: 35550658 PMC: 9101829. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8.