» Articles » PMID: 26372507

Covered Metallic Stents with an Anti-migration Design Vs. Uncovered Stents for the Palliation of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: a Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2015 Sep 16
PMID 26372507
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies reported comparable stent patency between covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) and uncovered SEMS (UCS) for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the newly developed WAVE-covered SEMS (WCS), which has an anti-migration design, compared with UCS in gastric cancer patients with symptomatic GOO.

Methods: A total of 102 inoperable gastric cancer patients with symptomatic GOO were prospectively enrolled from five referral centers and randomized to undergo UCS or WCS placement. Stent patency and recurrence of obstructive symptoms were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks after stent placement.

Results: At the 8-week follow-up, both stent patency rates (72.5% vs. 62.7%) and re-intervention rates (19.6% vs. 19.6%) were comparable between the WCS and the UCS groups. Both stent stenosis (2.4% vs. 8.1%) and migration rates (9.5% vs. 5.4%) were comparable between WCS and UCS groups. At the 16-week follow-up, however, the WCS group had a significantly higher stent patency rate than the UCS group (68.6% vs. 41.2%). Re-intervention rates in the WCS and UCS groups were 23.5% and 39.2%, respectively. Compared with the UCS group, the WCS group had a significantly lower stent restenosis rate (7.1% vs. 37.8%) and a comparable migration rate (9.5% vs. 5.4%). Overall stent patency was significantly longer in the WCS group than in the UCS group. No stent-associated significant adverse events occurred in either the WCS or UCS groups. In the multivariate analysis, WCS placement and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors of 16-week stent patency.

Conclusions: WCS group showed comparable migration rate and significantly more durable long-term stent patency compared with UCS group for the palliation of GOO in patients with inoperable gastric cancer.

Citing Articles

Treatment of choice for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: More than clearing the road.

Jiang L, Chen X World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(11):587-594.

PMID: 39600555 PMC: 11586723. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i11.587.


Gastric transcatheter chemoembolization combined with systemic chemotherapy vs. systemic chemotherapy alone for patients with advanced gastric cardiac cancer presenting with dysphagia: A case control study.

Li Z, Xu R, Sun P Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(2):367.

PMID: 38933810 PMC: 11200157. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14500.


Surgical versus endoscopic gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective multicentric comparative study of technical and clinical success.

Martinet E, Gonzalez J, Thobois M, Hamouda I, Hardwigsen J, Chopinet S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):192.

PMID: 38900214 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03365-1.


Endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: focusing on comparison of endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy.

Lim S, Kim C Clin Endosc. 2024; 57(5):571-580.

PMID: 38389304 PMC: 11474473. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.160.


Second Covered and Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Recurrent Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Takahara N, Nakai Y, Ishida K, Endo G, Kurihara K, Tange S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629282 PMC: 10455318. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165241.


References
1.
Jeurnink S, Steyerberg E, van Hooft J, van Eijck C, Schwartz M, Vleggaar F . Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 71(3):490-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.042. View

2.
Maetani I, Ukita T, Nambu T, Shigoka H, Omuta S, Endo T . Comparison of ultraflex and niti-s stents for palliation of unresectable malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. Dig Endosc. 2010; 22(2):83-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00942.x. View

3.
Abraha I, Montedori A . Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2010; 340:c2697. PMC: 2885592. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c2697. View

4.
Kim C, Choi I, Lee J, Cho S, Park S, Lee J . Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metallic stents for palliation of malignant pyloric obstruction in gastric cancer patients: a randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.039. View

5.
Kim Y, Choi C, Kang D, Kim H, Chung C, Kim D . A double-layered (comvi) self-expandable metal stent for malignant gastroduodenal obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Dig Dis Sci. 2011; 56(7):2030-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1566-5. View