» Articles » PMID: 26372021

Italian Percutaneous EVAR (IPER) Registry: Outcomes of 2381 Percutaneous Femoral Access Sites' Closure for Aortic Stent-graft

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 16
PMID 26372021
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this paper was to report outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair with percutaneous femoral access (pEVAR) using Prostar XL and Proglide closure systems (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), from the multicenter Italian Percutaneous EVAR (IPER) registry.

Methods: Consecutive patients affected by aortic pathology treated by EVAR with percutaneous access (pEVAR) between January 2010 and December 2014 at seven Italian centers were enrolled in this multicenter registry. All the operators had an experience of at least 50 percutaneous femoral access procedures. Data were prospectively collected into a dedicated online database including patient's demographics, anatomical features, intra- and postoperative outcomes. A retrospective analysis was carried out to report intraoperative and 30-day technical success and access-related complication rate. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors potentially associated with an increased risk of percutaneous pEVAR failure.

Results: A total of 2381 accesses were collected in 1322 patients, 1249 (94.4%) male with a mean age of 73.5±8.3 years (range 45-97). The overall technical success rate was 96.8% (2305/2381). Major intraoperative access-related complications requiring conversion to surgical cut-down were observed in 3.2% of the cases (76/2381). One-month pEVAR failure-rate was 0.25% (6/2381). Presence of femoral artery calcifications resulted to be a significant predictor of technical failure (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.03-2.77; P=0.036) at multivariate analysis. No significant association was observed with sex (P=0.28), obesity (P=0.64), CFA diameter (P=0.32), level of CFA bifurcation (P=0.94) and sheath size >18 F (P=0.24). The use of Proglide was associated with a lower failure rate compared to Prostar XL (2.5% vs. 3.3%) despite not statistically significant (P=0.33).

Conclusion: The results of the IPER registry confirm the high technical success rate of percutaneous EVAR when performed by experienced operators, even in presence of demanding anatomies. Femoral calcification represents the only predictor of percutaneous access failure.

Citing Articles

Optimizing Femoral Access in Emergency EVAR with a Decision-Making Algorithm.

Mirabella D, Bruno S, La Marca M, Dinoto E, Rodriquenz E, Micciche A Life (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39337897 PMC: 11433623. DOI: 10.3390/life14091113.


Endovascular aortic repair with sac embolization for the prevention of type II endoleaks (the EVAR-SE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled multicentre study in Germany.

Knappich C, Kirchhoff F, Fritsche M, Egert-Schwender S, Wendorff H, Kallmayer M Trials. 2024; 25(1):17.

PMID: 38167068 PMC: 10759747. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07888-8.


Vascular complications of ProGlide versus Prostar in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures: meta-analysis.

Xiang Y, Chen C, Zhao J, Ma Y, Huang B, Wu Z BJS Open. 2023; 7(4).

PMID: 37498966 PMC: 10373905. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad061.


Analysis of Determinants for Suture-mediated Closure Device Failure During EVAR Procedures.

Garabet W, Arnautovic A, Meurer L, Mulorz J, Rembe J, Duran M Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023; 58(2):129-135.

PMID: 37450890 PMC: 10768335. DOI: 10.1177/15385744231189356.


Comprehensive Evaluation of Common Open and Endovascular Procedures and Their Relationship with Postdischarge Complications.

Li R, Chia M, Eskandari M Ann Vasc Surg. 2022; 88:127-138.

PMID: 35803464 PMC: 9969701. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.06.016.