A Comparison of Four Beta-adrenoceptor Antagonists in Patients with Asthma
Overview
Affiliations
1 Cardiovascular and airways response to two non-cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, propranolol and pindolol (with partial agonist activity) and two cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, acebutolol (with partial agonist activity) and atenolol, were compared in twelve patients with asthma. 2 All four drugs produced a significant reduction in resting pulse rate and prevented the increase in heart rate following inhaled isoprenaline (1,500 microgram). 3 Seven patients in clinical remission showed no significant bronchoconstrictor response to any of the drugs. In the remaining five patients, bronchoconstriction was greatest following propranolol (mean reduction in FEV1 26.6%) and least following atenolol (mean reduction in FEV1 6.5%). 4 The bronchodilator response to inhaled isoprenaline was blocked by propranolol and pindolol but not by acebutolol and atenolol. 5 Partial agonist activity did not appear to be clinically useful.
Exploring the kinetic selectivity of drugs targeting the β -adrenoceptor.
Sykes D, Jimenez-Roses M, Reilly J, Fairhurst R, Charlton S, Veprintsev D Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022; 10(4):e00978.
PMID: 35762357 PMC: 9237807. DOI: 10.1002/prp2.978.
Zolotareva O, Saik O, Konigs C, Bragina E, Goncharova I, Freidin M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):16302.
PMID: 31705029 PMC: 6841742. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52762-w.
Cleveland K, Liang S, Chang A, Huang K, Chen S, Guo L PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0217038.
PMID: 31107911 PMC: 6527222. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217038.
Guidance on the diagnosis and management of asthma among adults in resource limited settings.
Kirenga B, Schwartz J, de Jong C, van der Molen T, Okot-Nwang M Afr Health Sci. 2016; 15(4):1189-99.
PMID: 26958020 PMC: 4765426. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v15i4.18.
Excess costs of comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.
Huber M, Wacker M, Vogelmeier C, Leidl R PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0123292.
PMID: 25875204 PMC: 4405814. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123292.