» Articles » PMID: 26367866

MUC1 Predicts Colorectal Cancer Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case Controlled Studies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Sep 15
PMID 26367866
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predicting value of MUC1 expression in lymph node and distant metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: Pubmed/ MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify eligible studies that evaluated the correlation between MUC1 and CRC. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of MUC1 expression on CRC metastasis.

Results: A total of 18 studies (n = 3271) met inclusion criteria and the mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score was 6.3 with a range from 4 to 8. The pooled OR in the meta-analysis of 15 studies indicated that positive MUC1 expression correlated with more CRC node metastasis (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.63-3.29). The data synthesis of 6 studies suggested that MUC1 expression predicted more possibility of CRC distant metastasis (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.23-4.00). In addition, the combined OR of 7 studies showed that MUC1 expression indicated higher Duke's stage (OR = 3.02, 95% CI = 2.11-4.33). No publication bias was found in the mate-analysis by Begg's test or Egger's test with the exception of the meta-analysis of MUC1 with CRC node metastasis (Begg's test p = 0.729, Egger's test p = 0.000).

Conclusions: Despite of some modest bias, the pooled evidence suggested that MUC1 expression was significantly correlated with CRC metastasis.

Citing Articles

Dual-functional probe for sensitive detection of MCF-7 cells and mendelian randomization analysis of MUC1 association with multiple cancers.

Wu Z, Chen Q, Lin Z, Chen Y, Gan X, He Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6167.

PMID: 39979505 PMC: 11842835. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90575-2.


Therapeutic Applications of Rosmarinic Acid in Cancer-Chemotherapy-Associated Resistance and Toxicity.

Villegas C, Cortez N, Ogundele A, Burgos V, Pardi P, Cabrera-Pardo J Biomolecules. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39062581 PMC: 11274592. DOI: 10.3390/biom14070867.


Markers of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Mucinous Histology Are Significant Predictors of Disease Severity and Tumor Characteristics in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Djikic Rom A, Dragicevic S, Jankovic R, Radojevic Skodric S, Sabljak P, Markovic V Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061649 PMC: 11275501. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141512.


Unraveling the role of C1GALT1 in abnormal glycosylation and colorectal cancer progression.

Tian H, Yu J, Chu X, Guan Q, Liu J, Liu Y Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1389713.

PMID: 38699634 PMC: 11063370. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1389713.


The Role of Liquid Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of WHO Grade 4 Astrocytoma.

Halawa T, Baeesa S, Fadul M, Badahdah A, Enani M, Fathaddin A Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e41221.

PMID: 37525780 PMC: 10387356. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41221.


References
1.
Mulder W, Stukart M, de Windt E, Wagstaff J, Scheper R, Bloemena E . Mucin-1-related T cell infiltration in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1996; 42(6):351-6. PMC: 11037846. DOI: 10.1007/s002620050293. View

2.
Kashiwagi H, Kijima H, Dowaki S, Ohtani Y, Tobita K, TSUKUI M . DF3 expression in human gallbladder carcinoma: significance for lymphatic invasion. Int J Oncol. 2000; 16(3):455-9. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.16.3.455. View

3.
Guo Q, Tang W, Inagaki Y, Midorikawa Y, Kokudo N, Sugawara Y . Clinical significance of subcellular localization of KL-6 mucin in primary colorectal adenocarcinoma and metastatic tissues. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12(1):54-9. PMC: 4077483. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i1.54. View

4.
Kimura T, McKolanis J, Dzubinski L, Islam K, Potter D, Salazar A . MUC1 vaccine for individuals with advanced adenoma of the colon: a cancer immunoprevention feasibility study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012; 6(1):18-26. PMC: 3536916. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0275. View

5.
Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T . Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62(4):220-41. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21149. View