» Articles » PMID: 26355988

Accurate Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Volumetrically Assess Bone Grafting in Alveolar Cleft Patients

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 11
PMID 26355988
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess the volume of bone graft in alveolar cleft patients.

Materials And Methods: Twelve patients of unilateral alveolar cleft were included in this study. All patients were taken CBCT preoperative and 1 week postoperative. The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) files were imported into Simplant software and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the alveolar defect was achieved. With 3D volumetric measurements module, the volume of alveolar cleft was calculated preoperatively. During operation, the syringe compression method was adopted to calculate the actual amount of bone graft. One week postoperative, CBCT scan was performed again to measure the bone volume grafted to the defect. The volumetric ratio of the syringe compression method to preoperative CBCT assessment and the volume difference between syringe compression method and postoperative CBCT assessment were analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT measurement.

Results: The 3D structure of the alveolar cleft and the boundary of bone graft was clear from CBCT images. The estimated volume of alveolar cleft by preoperative CBCT scans was 1.06 ± 0.09 cm, and the actual amount of bone graft determined by the syringe compression method was 1.51 ± 0.12 cm. The ratio between the latter to the former was 1.43 ± 0.07. The calculated volume of bone graft by 1-week postoperative CBCT scans was 1.53 ± 0.11 cm, with no significant difference compared with the actual amount of bone graft (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: CBCT was an accurate measurement to calculate the volume of alveolar defect and bone graft in alveolar cleft patients. Preoperative scans could aid in quantitatively determining the bone amount needed to adequately fill the bone defect, and the postoperative scans give accurate follow-up evaluation after surgery.

Citing Articles

A Review of Orthodontic Considerations before and after Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Cabrera C Acta Med Philipp. 2025; 58(21):7-19.

PMID: 39758297 PMC: 11694040. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6985.


Validation and comparison of 2D grading scales and 3D volumetric measurements for outcome assessment of bone-grafted alveolar clefts in children.

Lemberger M, Benchimol D, Pegelow M, Jacobs R, Karsten A Eur J Orthod. 2024; 46(2).

PMID: 38346109 PMC: 10872128. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae002.


Evaluation of the linear and volumetric measuring changes in different positions in CBCT.

Fani S, Moudi E, Haghanifar S, Seyedmajidi S, Poursattar-Bejeh Mir A Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023; 9(3):535-542.

PMID: 37016557 PMC: 10280609. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.732.


Characterization of eggshell as a bio-regeneration material.

Opris H, Baciut M, Bran S, Dinu C, Armencea G, Opris D Med Pharm Rep. 2023; 96(1):93-100.

PMID: 36818316 PMC: 9924816. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-2476.


Comparison of Alveolar Bone Grafting Outcomes using CBCT in Individuals with UCLP Based on the Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment Methods.

Ko J, Rustia S, Alkharafi L, Ganguly R, Yen S, Oberoi S Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023; 61(5):791-800.

PMID: 36748327 PMC: 10981178. DOI: 10.1177/10556656221143945.