» Articles » PMID: 26355122

Defining Thresholds for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Octogenarians

Abstract

To generate outcome-driven thresholds for home blood pressure (BP) in the elderly, we analyzed 375 octogenarians (60.3% women; 83.0 years [mean]) enrolled in the International Database on home BP in relation to cardiovascular outcome. Over 5.5 years (median), 155 participants died, 76 from cardiovascular causes, whereas 104, 55, 36, and 51 experienced a cardiovascular, cardiac, coronary, or cerebrovascular event, respectively. In 202 untreated participants, home diastolic in the lowest fifth of the distribution (≤65.1 mm Hg) compared with the multivariable-adjusted average risk was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (hazard ratios [HRs], ≥1.96; P≤0.022), whereas the HR for cardiovascular mortality in the top fifth (≥82.0 mm Hg) was 0.37 (P=0.034). Among 173 participants treated for hypertension, the HR for total mortality in the lowest fifth of systolic home BP (<126.9 mm Hg) was 2.09 (P=0.020). In further analyses of home BP as continuous variable (per 1-SD increment), higher diastolic BP predicted lower cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and cardiac and coronary risk (HR≤0.65; P≤0.039) in untreated participants. In those treated, cardiovascular morbidity was curvilinearly associated with systolic home BP with nadir at 148.6 mm Hg and with a 1.45 HR (P=0.046) for a 1-SD decrease below this threshold. In conclusion, in untreated octogenarians, systolic home BP ≥152.4 and diastolic BP ≤65.1 mm Hg entails increased cardiovascular risk, whereas diastolic home BP ≥82 mm Hg minimizes risk. In those treated, systolic home BP <126.9 mm Hg was associated with increased total mortality with lowest risk at 148.6 mm Hg.

Citing Articles

The HOPE Asia Network consensus on blood pressure measurements corresponding to office measurements: Automated office, home, and ambulatory blood pressures.

Shin J, Wang J, Chia Y, Kario K, Chen C, Cheng H J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023; 26(12):1351-1361.

PMID: 37878534 PMC: 11654862. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14729.


Home blood pressure measurement consistency and cognitive impairment.

Hoshide S, Nishizawa M, Kanegae H, Kario K Hypertens Res. 2023; 47(1):177-183.

PMID: 37726350 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01436-2.


What did we learn from the International Databases on Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcome?.

Asayama K, Stolarz-Skrzypek K, Yang W, Hansen T, Brguljan-Hitij J, Odili A Hypertens Res. 2023; 46(4):934-949.

PMID: 36737461 PMC: 10073019. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01191-4.


How to obtain more evidence for the management of hypertension in frail patients over 80 years old?.

Benetos A Eur Geriatr Med. 2021; 9(2):137-140.

PMID: 34654264 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-018-0035-5.


Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension.

Parati G, Stergiou G, Bilo G, Kollias A, Pengo M, Ochoa J J Hypertens. 2021; 39(9):1742-1767.

PMID: 34269334 PMC: 9904446. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002922.