» Articles » PMID: 26352764

Wisdom in Medicine: What Helps Physicians After a Medical Error?

Overview
Journal Acad Med
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2015 Sep 10
PMID 26352764
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Confronting medical error openly is critical to organizational learning, but less is known about what helps individual clinicians learn and adapt positively after making a harmful mistake. Understanding what factors help doctors gain wisdom can inform educational and peer support programs, and may facilitate the development of specific tools to assist doctors after harmful errors occur.

Method: Using "posttraumatic growth" as a model, the authors conducted semistructured interviews (2009-2011) with 61 physicians who had made a serious medical error. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and coded by two study team members (kappa 0.8) using principles of grounded theory and NVivo software. Coders also scored interviewees as wisdom exemplars or nonexemplars based on Ardelt's three-dimensional wisdom model.

Results: Of the 61 physicians interviewed, 33 (54%) were male, and on average, eight years had elapsed since the error. Wisdom exemplars were more likely to report disclosing the error to the patient/family (69%) than nonexemplars (38%); P < .03. Fewer than 10% of all participants reported receiving disclosure training. Investigators identified eight themes reflecting what helped physician wisdom exemplars cope positively: talking about it, disclosure and apology, forgiveness, a moral context, dealing with imperfection, learning/becoming an expert, preventing recurrences/improving teamwork, and helping others/teaching.

Conclusions: The path forged by doctors who coped well with medical error highlights specific ways to help clinicians move through this difficult experience so that they avoid devastating professional outcomes and have the best chance of not just recovery but positive growth.

Citing Articles

Measuring how healthcare organizations respond after patients experience harm: perspectives and next steps.

Sokol-Hessner L, Adams J, Hemmelgarn C, Miller B, OConnor D, Parkerton M Front Health Serv. 2025; 4:1488944.

PMID: 39906536 PMC: 11790648. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1488944.


Understanding veterinary practitioners' responses to adverse events using a combined grounded theory and netnographic natural language processing approach.

Gibson J, Oxtoby C, Brennan M, White K PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314081.

PMID: 39636830 PMC: 11620440. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314081.


Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Resident Error Response Factors.

Adkins S, Reynolds P, Rabah K, Flowers S MedEdPORTAL. 2024; 20:11451.

PMID: 39391216 PMC: 11466310. DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11451.


Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Error Response Factors in Family Medicine Residents.

Adkins S, Altaany R, Brar K, Kauser H, Hughbanks S, Rabah K J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024; 11:23821205241272358.

PMID: 39149530 PMC: 11325321. DOI: 10.1177/23821205241272358.


Associations between medical students' stress, academic burnout and moral courage efficacy.

Neufeld-Kroszynski G, Michael K, Karnieli-Miller O BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):296.

PMID: 38802899 PMC: 11129364. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01787-6.