» Articles » PMID: 26352385

From Theory to Practice: Implementation of a Resource Allocation Model in Health Departments

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 10
PMID 26352385
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a resource allocation model to optimize health departments' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded HIV prevention budgets to prevent the most new cases of HIV infection and to evaluate the model's implementation in 4 health departments.

Design, Settings, And Participants: We developed a linear programming model combined with a Bernoulli process model that allocated a fixed budget among HIV prevention interventions and risk subpopulations to maximize the number of new infections prevented. The model, which required epidemiologic, behavioral, budgetary, and programmatic data, was implemented in health departments in Philadelphia, Chicago, Alabama, and Nebraska.

Main Outcome Measures: The optimal allocation of funds, the site-specific cost per case of HIV infection prevented rankings by intervention, and the expected number of HIV cases prevented.

Results: The model suggested allocating funds to HIV testing and continuum-of-care interventions in all 4 health departments. The most cost-effective intervention for all sites was HIV testing in nonclinical settings for men who have sex with men, and the least cost-effective interventions were behavioral interventions for HIV-negative persons. The pilot sites required 3 to 4 months of technical assistance to develop data inputs and generate and interpret the results. Although the sites found the model easy to use in providing quantitative evidence for allocating HIV prevention resources, they criticized the exclusion of structural interventions and the use of the model to allocate only CDC funds.

Conclusions: Resource allocation models have the potential to improve the allocation of limited HIV prevention resources and can be used as a decision-making guide for state and local health departments. Using such models may require substantial staff time and technical assistance. These model results emphasize the allocation of CDC funds toward testing and continuum-of-care interventions and populations at highest risk of HIV transmission.

Citing Articles

Associations Between Local Health Department Expenditures on Foundational Capabilities and PHAB Accreditation Standards Scores.

Dada O, Bekemeier B, Flaxman A, de Castro A Front Public Health. 2022; 10:861587.

PMID: 35692346 PMC: 9174657. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861587.


Research Synthesis, HIV Prevention Response, and Public Health: CDC's HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Project.

Koenig L, Lyles C, Higa D, Mullins M, Sipe T Public Health Rep. 2021; 137(1):32-47.

PMID: 33635724 PMC: 8721762. DOI: 10.1177/0033354920988871.


Job burnout and turnover intention among Chinese primary healthcare staff: the mediating effect of satisfaction.

Ran L, Chen X, Peng S, Zheng F, Tan X, Duan R BMJ Open. 2020; 10(10):e036702.

PMID: 33033013 PMC: 7542935. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036702.


Optimal allocation of HIV prevention funds for state health departments.

Yaylali E, Farnham P, Cohen S, Purcell D, Hauck H, Sansom S PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197421.

PMID: 29768489 PMC: 5955542. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197421.


Improving Linkage, Retention, and Reengagement in HIV Care in 12 Metropolitan Areas.

Neumann M, Carey J, Flores S, Fisher H, Hoyte T, Pitts N Health Promot Pract. 2017; 19(5):704-713.

PMID: 29191081 PMC: 5930145. DOI: 10.1177/1524839917741310.


References
1.
Lasry A, Sansom S, Hicks K, Uzunangelov V . A model for allocating CDC's HIV prevention resources in the United States. Health Care Manag Sci. 2010; 14(1):115-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-010-9147-2. View

2.
Christopoulos K, Das M, Colfax G . Linkage and retention in HIV care among men who have sex with men in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52 Suppl 2:S214-22. PMC: 3106256. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciq045. View

3.
Kelly J, St Lawrence J, Diaz Y, Stevenson L, Hauth A, Brasfield T . HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public Health. 1991; 81(2):168-71. PMC: 1404968. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.2.168. View

4.
Alistar S, Brandeau M . Decision making for HIV prevention and treatment scale up: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Med Decis Making. 2010; 32(1):105-17. PMC: 3271126. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10391808. View

5.
Marks G, Gardner L, Craw J, Crepaz N . Entry and retention in medical care among HIV-diagnosed persons: a meta-analysis. AIDS. 2010; 24(17):2665-78. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833f4b1b. View