» Articles » PMID: 26347669

Metaphor and Hyperassociativity: the Imagination Mechanisms Behind Emotion Assimilation in Sleep and Dreaming

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Sep 9
PMID 26347669
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper we propose an emotion assimilation function of sleep and dreaming. We offer explanations both for the mechanisms by which waking-life memories are initially selected for processing during sleep, and for the mechanisms by which those memories are subsequently transformed during sleep. We propose that emotions act as a marker for information to be selectively processed during sleep, including consolidation into long term memory structures and integration into pre-existing memory networks; that dreaming reflects these emotion assimilation processes; and that the associations between memory fragments activated during sleep give rise to measureable elements of dream metaphor and hyperassociativity. The latter are a direct reflection, and the phenomenological experience, of emotional memory assimilation processes occurring during sleep. While many theories previously have posited a role for emotion processing and/or emotional memory consolidation during sleep and dreaming, sleep theories often do not take enough account of important dream science data, yet dream research, when conducted systematically and under ideal conditions, can greatly enhance theorizing around the functions of sleep. Similarly, dream theories often fail to consider the implications of sleep-dependent memory research, which can augment our understanding of dream functioning. Here, we offer a synthesized view, taking detailed account of both sleep and dream data and theories. We draw on extensive literature from sleep and dream experiments and theories, including often-overlooked data from dream science which we believe reflects sleep phenomenology, to bring together important ideas and findings from both domains.

Citing Articles

Nightmare distress mediated the correlation between autobiographical memory specificity and depression.

Wang J, Fu H, Feng X, Shen H PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318661.

PMID: 39999043 PMC: 11856582. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318661.


Dreaming of being chased reflects waking-life experiences related to negative relationships with others metaphorically.

Wang J, Feng X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1413011.

PMID: 39131866 PMC: 11310133. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1413011.


The Epistemic Limits of Impactful Dreams: Metacognition, Metaphoricity, and Sublime Feeling.

Kuiken D Brain Sci. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38928529 PMC: 11202295. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060528.


Evidence of an active role of dreaming in emotional memory processing shows that we dream to forget.

Zhang J, Pena A, Delano N, Sattari N, Shuster A, Baker F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8722.

PMID: 38622204 PMC: 11018802. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58170-z.


Awake or Sleeping? Maybe Both… A Review of Sleep-Related Dissociative States.

Sodre M, Wiessner I, Irfan M, Schenck C, Mota-Rolim S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 37373570 PMC: 10299622. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123876.


References
1.
Fox K, Nijeboer S, Solomonova E, Domhoff G, Christoff K . Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:412. PMC: 3726865. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00412. View

2.
Ellenbogen J, Hu P, Payne J, Titone D, Walker M . Human relational memory requires time and sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(18):7723-8. PMC: 1863467. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700094104. View

3.
Wright J, Koulack D . Dreams and contemporary stress: a disruption-avoidance-adaptation model. Sleep. 1987; 10(2):172-9. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/10.2.172. View

4.
Domhoff G . The neural substrate for dreaming: is it a subsystem of the default network?. Conscious Cogn. 2011; 20(4):1163-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.001. View

5.
Blagrove M, Henley-Einion J, Barnett A, Edwards D, Heidi Seage C . A replication of the 5-7 day dream-lag effect with comparison of dreams to future events as control for baseline matching. Conscious Cogn. 2010; 20(2):384-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.07.006. View