» Articles » PMID: 26347644

Stable Phase-shift Despite Quasi-rhythmic Movements: a CPG-driven Dynamic Model of Active Tactile Exploration in an Insect

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Sep 9
PMID 26347644
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An essential component of autonomous and flexible behavior in animals is active exploration of the environment, allowing for perception-guided planning and control of actions. An important sensory system involved is active touch. Here, we introduce a general modeling framework of Central Pattern Generators (CPGs) for movement generation in active tactile exploration behavior. The CPG consists of two network levels: (i) phase-coupled Hopf oscillators for rhythm generation, and (ii) pattern formation networks for capturing the frequency and phase characteristics of individual joint oscillations. The model captured the natural, quasi-rhythmic joint kinematics as observed in coordinated antennal movements of walking stick insects. Moreover, it successfully produced tactile exploration behavior on a three-dimensional skeletal model of the insect antennal system with physically realistic parameters. The effect of proprioceptor ablations could be simulated by changing the amplitude and offset parameters of the joint oscillators, only. As in the animal, the movement of both antennal joints was coupled with a stable phase difference, despite the quasi-rhythmicity of the joint angle time courses. We found that the phase-lead of the distal scape-pedicel (SP) joint relative to the proximal head-scape (HS) joint was essential for producing the natural tactile exploration behavior and, thus, for tactile efficiency. For realistic movement patterns, the phase-lead could vary within a limited range of 10-30° only. Tests with artificial movement patterns strongly suggest that this phase sensitivity is not a matter of the frequency composition of the natural movement pattern. Based on our modeling results, we propose that a constant phase difference is coded into the CPG of the antennal motor system and that proprioceptors are acting locally to regulate the joint movement amplitude.

Citing Articles

Towards an Understanding of Control of Complex Rhythmical "Wavelike" Coordination in Humans.

Sanders R, Levitin D Brain Sci. 2020; 10(4).

PMID: 32260547 PMC: 7226120. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10040215.

References
1.
Grillner S . Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion. Neuron. 2006; 52(5):751-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.008. View

2.
Towal R, Hartmann M . Variability in velocity profiles during free-air whisking behavior of unrestrained rats. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 100(2):740-52. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01295.2007. View

3.
Baba Y, Tsukada A, Comer C . Collision avoidance by running insects: antennal guidance in cockroaches. J Exp Biol. 2010; 213(Pt 13):2294-302. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.036996. View

4.
Zuo Y, Perkon I, Diamond M . Whisking and whisker kinematics during a texture classification task. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1581):3058-69. PMC: 3172602. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0161. View

5.
Kozlov A, Huss M, Lansner A, Hellgren Kotaleski J, Grillner S . Simple cellular and network control principles govern complex patterns of motor behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(47):20027-32. PMC: 2785286. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906722106. View