» Articles » PMID: 26347450

Comparison of Fracture Resistance Between Cast, CAD/CAM Milling, and Direct Metal Laser Sintering Metal Post Systems

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Sep 9
PMID 26347450
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of Co-Cr post-cores fabricated with 3 different techniques: traditional casting (TC), computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milling (CCM) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS).

Methods: Forty intact human mandibular premolar were endodontically treated. The roots were then randomly divided into four groups according to the post systems: the control group was only filled with gutta percha. Co-Cr metal posts were fabricated with TC, CCM and DMLS in the other three groups. The posts were luted with a resin cement and subjected to compression test at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The statistical analysis of the data was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison post hoc Tukey tests (α=.05). The samples were examined under a stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification for the evaluation of the fracture types.

Results: The mean fracture loads were 432.69 N for control, 608.89 N for TC, 689.40 N for DMLS and 959.26 N for CCM. One-way ANOVA revealed significant difference between the groups (p<0.01). In the post hoc Tukey test, there were significant differences between groups except DMLS and TC.

Conclusion: While Co-Cr posts fabricated by TC and DMLS systems performed similarly in terms of fracture resistance, posts fabricated by CCM techniques showed higher fracture resistance values.

Significance: Co-Cr metal posts fabricated by CCM and DMLS could be an alternative to TC processing in daily clinical application.

Citing Articles

The Comparison of Accuracy of Post Space Digital Impressions Made by Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.

Meshni A, Jain S, Osaysi H, Hezam K, Adlan S Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767254 PMC: 11675620. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242893.


Dimensional Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners in Recording Digital Impressions of Post and Core Preparations: A Systematic Review.

Alqahtani S, Almalki M, Almarzouki M, AlResayes S, Hassan N, Mohana A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767251 PMC: 11675224. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242890.


Clinical Acceptance of Digitally Produced Zirconia and Metal Post and Cores, Based on the Impression Method.

Perlea P, Stefanescu C, Petre A Clin Pract. 2024; 14(6):2533-2541.

PMID: 39585027 PMC: 11586991. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14060199.


Balancing Function and Proprioception: A Case Report Featuring Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-Fabricated Marburg Denture System.

Jain R, Pisulkar S, Kambala S, Bansod A, Beri A, Deshmukh S Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69006.

PMID: 39385900 PMC: 11463897. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69006.


Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM tooth-colored versus cast metal post-and-core restorations in root filled teeth: An in vitro study.

Jrab B, Rahman Saleh A, Al-Jadaa A, Jurado C, Saeed M, Afrashtehfar K Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(9):1215-1220.

PMID: 39286579 PMC: 11402007. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.07.002.