» Articles » PMID: 26345395

The Decision: Relations to Oneself, Authority and Vulnerability in the Field of Selective Abortion

Overview
Journal Biosocieties
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Sep 9
PMID 26345395
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article is about selective abortion. It concentrates on the existential, moral and social conditions that arise when pregnant women, using prenatal diagnosis (PND), are told that there is something seriously wrong with the foetuses that they are carrying. This is characterised as a micro state of emergency, where both normal cognitive categories and normative orders are dissolved. The analyses are anchored in the womens' own presentations and understandings of the processes and dilemmas related to the abortion decisions, and our most important empirical materials are interviews with women who have experienced them. Our main ambition is to show the relation between some important dimensions of the situation in which the abortion decision has to be made, and the special kind of authority on behalf of the women that presents itself. Of equal importance is the vulnerability of the pregnant women, resulting in a co-production of the women as both Sovereigns and Homo Sacer in the decision situation. We also analyse some of the experienced relations between the women and the foetuses, and how the women constitute themselves as moral subjects, with a particular emphasis on the motifs of sacrifice and self-sacrifice. It is a central argument in the article that we have to understand the specificity of the decision situation, without reducing it either to other phases (before or after) of the total processes of PND and selective abortion, or to general discourses of disability or normality. The specificity of the situation in which the abortion decision is made is a pivotal point in society's regulation (in a broad sense) of the field and in the constitution of the regime of selective abortion.

Citing Articles

Factors influencing obstetricians' acceptance of termination of pregnancy beyond the first trimester: a qualitative study.

De Meyer F, Chambaere K, Van de Velde S, Van Assche K, Beernaert K, Sterckx S BMC Med Ethics. 2025; 26(1):32.

PMID: 40045316 PMC: 11881364. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01186-5.


Shouldering Death: Moral Tensions, Ambiguity, and the Unintended Ramifications of State-sanctioned Second-trimester Selective Abortion in Denmark.

Heinsen L Med Anthropol Q. 2022; 36(4):515-533.

PMID: 35819201 PMC: 10084180. DOI: 10.1111/maq.12717.


Coming to terms with the imperfectly normal child: attitudes of Israeli parents of screen-positive infants regarding subsequent prenatal diagnosis.

Raz A, Amano Y, Timmermans S J Community Genet. 2018; 10(1):41-50.

PMID: 29504050 PMC: 6325039. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0361-9.

References
1.
Kersting A, Kroker K, Steinhard J, Hoernig-Franz I, Wesselmann U, Luedorff K . Psychological impact on women after second and third trimester termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies versus women after preterm birth--a 14-month follow up study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009; 12(4):193-201. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-009-0063-8. View

2.
McCoyd J . Discrepant feeling rules and unscripted emotion work: women coping with termination for fetal anomaly. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010; 79(4):441-51. DOI: 10.1037/a0010483. View

3.
Burgoine G, Van Kirk S, Romm J, Edelman A, Jacobson S, Jensen J . Comparison of perinatal grief after dilation and evacuation or labor induction in second trimester terminations for fetal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192(6):1928-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.064. View

4.
Schwennesen N, Koch L . Representing and intervening: 'doing' good care in first trimester prenatal knowledge production and decision-making. Sociol Health Illn. 2012; 34(2):283-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01414.x. View

5.
Heyman B, Hundt G, Sandall J, Spencer K, Williams C, Grellier R . On being at higher risk: a qualitative study of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 62(10):2360-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.018. View