» Articles » PMID: 26344194

Face Masks and Basketball: NCAA Division I Consumer Trends and a Review of Over-the-counter Face Masks

Overview
Journal Laryngoscope
Date 2015 Sep 8
PMID 26344194
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: This study aims to: 1) determine the current consumer trends of over-the-counter (OTC) and custom-made face mask usage among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs; and 2) provide a literature review of OTC face guards and a classified database.

Study Design: Literature review and survey.

Methods: Consumer trends were obtained by contacting all 352 NCAA Division I programs. Athletic trainers present in the office when called answered the following questions: 1) "When an athlete breaks his or her nose, is a custom or generic face guard used?" and 2) "What brand is the generic face guard that is used?" Data was analyzed to determine trends among athletic programs. Also, a database of OTC devices available was generated using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer Web sites.

Results: Among the 352 NCAA Division I athletic programs, 254 programs participated in the survey (72% response rate). The majority preferred custom-made guards (46%). Disadvantages included high cost and slow manufacture turnaround time. Only 20% of the programs strictly used generic brands. For the face mask database, 10 OTC products were identified and classified into four categories based on design, with pricing ranging between $35.99 and $69.95.

Conclusion: Only a handful of face masks exist for U.S. consumers, but none of them have been reviewed or classified by product design, sport application, price, and collegiate consumer use. This project details usage trends among NCAA Division I athletic programs and provides a list of available devices that can be purchased to protect the nose and face during sports.

Level Of Evidence: NA. Laryngoscope, 126:1054-1060, 2016.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of ABS-like Resin for Stereolithography Versus ABS for Fused Deposition Modeling in Three-Dimensional Printing Applications for Odontology.

Goncalves V, Vieira C, Simonassi N, Lopes F, Youssef G, Colorado H Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39458749 PMC: 11511427. DOI: 10.3390/polym16202921.


On the Court: A Comprehensive Analysis of Basketball Facial Trauma.

Othman S, Cohn J, McKinnon B Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2019; 12(4):266-270.

PMID: 31719950 PMC: 6839978. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679930.


Improvement of the Shock Absorption Ability of a Face Guard by Incorporating a Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic and Buffering Space.

Wada T, Churei H, Takayanagi H, Iwasaki N, Ueno T, Takahashi H Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:6503568.

PMID: 29854774 PMC: 5964619. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6503568.

References
1.
Benson B, Rose M, Meeuwisse W . The impact of face shield use on concussions in ice hockey: a multivariate analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2002; 36(1):27-32. PMC: 1724466. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.36.1.27. View

2.
BURT C, Overpeck M . Emergency visits for sports-related injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37(3):301-8. DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.111707. View

3.
Tuna E, Ozel E . Factors affecting sports-related orofacial injuries and the importance of mouthguards. Sports Med. 2014; 44(6):777-83. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0167-9. View

4.
Tanaka N, Hayashi S, Amagasa T, Kohama G . Maxillofacial fractures sustained during sports. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54(6):715-9; discussion 719-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90688-6. View

5.
Kvittem B, Hardie N, Roettger M, Conry J . Incidence of orofacial injuries in high school sports. J Public Health Dent. 1999; 58(4):288-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1998.tb03011.x. View